Title

  • Goldholz @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 days ago

    Killing hitler and the nazis. Not just the top guys. Also the bottom layers of the system.

    Killing is bad. But…its nazis.

    Same also goes to all other dictators and their helpers. Stalin, Mao, Mussolini, Putin, Assat, Lenin

      • Goldholz @lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        Yes. And maybe also rework all our democracys that its not one person with power* but a council like in switzerland and rework it that these kinds of people have no chance of ever poping up aka ENSURE THAT PEOPLE HAVE NO LIVING PROBLEMS aka make sure everyone has housing, food, water, education no matter how much money it costs. Oooh nooo that would hurt the shareholders. Nawww too bad. LETS HURT THEM MORE!

  • brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Police. As much as I hate their current incarnation, I. Some form or fashion they are required to handle those that do harm to others intentionally.

    • DempstersBox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Except here’s the thing: in every form and fashion, they don’t actually do anything to the ones doing the most harm

  • notabot@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 days ago

    Surgery, especially on animals.

    In any other context, someone cutting you open, slicing bits out or rearranging them, them sewing you shut would be considered horrific, but we do it because we know that the short term suffering out weighs the long term harm of not doing it. When you choose it for yourself it might not be too ‘evil’, but an animal would not understand, even if you know it will mean they get to live a long, happy life, free of the pain and suffering that issue would otherwise cause.

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 days ago

    Tax. Noone wants their money to be taken away. But it’s probably a good idea to have at least some government funded stuff.

    • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      I mean, corrupted administration aside, is it really even “evil” to fund a institution that forsee the development of your surrounding? If anything it’s simply quid pro quo, and people who generally against any taxation is always fishy to me.

    • Emi@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      I might be wrong but I think people would gladly pay 50% of their income as tax if it meant they would get their basic needs met and see the money be put to a good use. Imagine getting just half your pay but be able to fully use it on whatever you want and not have to worry about food and rent. Or at least that’s what I’d like to believe.

      • garbagebagel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        The Blackfoot nation on which Maslow based his hierarchy of needs would actually have a celebration each year where they’d give everything they’d amassed away.

        The actual basis for the “hierarchy” of needs is essentially that a community takes care of each other so that all needs are met, and this is found not just in Blackfoot but along the majority of indigenous cultures. (I write in quotes because it was never really a hierarchy, it was more of a cyclical chain of getting needs met)

        There’s a really good read on what inspired the Hierarchy of Needs here. Most of the changes that Maslow made to his findings were actually due to him wanting to make it more palatable for his individualistic colonial audience.

      • zxqwas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Where I live a majority of the voters are generally okay with high taxes (35%-50%) as long as it’s only shared with other people who works and pays taxes.

          • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            Plenty of people think they’re already getting more than they need and anyone who says otherwise is just pretending to be ill to get a free ride at the taxpayers’ expense, and could just get a job if they wanted. The right wing press pushes this narrative and people fall for it.

      • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        The tax being on your income and not entirely on corporations always felt like a fairly biased distinction. If companies paid the entire income tax long before it got to you, and you were simply paid ~2/3rds as much, I feel like people’s opinions would be different despite not much changing.

        • zxqwas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          Tax laws are usually made to make it easy to collect, hard to dodge taxes.

          If companies pay all the tax I could create a company, invoice my current employer, pay myself a salary that is equal to the entire profit margin. There is nothing left to tax.

          You could try to patch the loophole but then you’ll break down something else.

          • elephantium@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            That sounds backwards to me. If companies are paying all the taxes, why would you insert a second company into the chain? Then both companies would be paying a tax portion, and your salary would be that much less than if you just had a job.

            Or were you thinking that you could bamboozle the government out of the tax revenue by saying “Oops, no profit! Salaries cost too much!”? I don’t think that would work unless the entire structure was built with one directive in mind: “Reward Hollywood accounting”

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 days ago

    Existence. It’s also a paradox because without existence it’s impossible to be either evil or necessary.

  • TheBeege@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 days ago

    Money. It encourages greed, but it allows us to scale exchange of goods and services far more than we otherwise could

  • blarghly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 days ago

    Government.

    In an ideal world, everyone would get along and coordinate effectively in a voluntary manner. There would be no need for any government to enforce laws or provide services.

    • MedicsOfAnarchy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Not sure why anyone’s downvoting this. If someone you’ve never met thinks that you have to put your life on the line, and therefore may possibly die, to further a cause - let them explain that cause. If they can’t convince you it’s more important than your life, then maybe it isn’t.

      See: Vietnam, etc.

      Edit: My bad, I was thinking, “What’s a good example of evil?” - Conscription should never be “necessary”. The only thing conscription does is protect the status quo. Keep the upvote - it was an honest mistake on my part.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 days ago

        Vietnam is a good example of a bad example. WWII is a better example of the necessary evil part, especially countries that were invaded.

      • BurgerBaron@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        I considered that risk before getting a Pixel 8 and it burns a little yeah. I’ll use it like every other phone that stops getting updates for a few more years in the worst case scenario, then move to FairPhone I guess.

        • RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          The updates will take a little longer that is all. GOS is not in the same boat as other custom rom devs - they don’t have build trees either.

          GOS is talking to a couple of OEMs about getting a GOS phone produced.

  • T3CHT@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Lobotomy, electroshock and castration are historic treatments for various extreme mental disorders that were, probably mistakenly, considered necessary evils lacking other treatments.

    These days prozac, benzos and lithium fall into a similar category.

    • TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I’m not sure if you’re comparing SSRIs to castration but I’m gonna assume you’re not.

      I dont think any prescriber would consider any of those medicines necessary. a much better example would be steroids like prednisone. it weakens your immune system, but it’s absolutely necessary at times.

      SSRIs are rarely necessary, but are a useful tool. too much to say on this.

      Benzos are a short term solution to enable more longer term treatments. they’re absolute monsters of a drug class, but really effective for sure.

      fentanyl would be a better example of a necessary evil. it’s synthesis revolutionized surgery.

      finally, lithium is a funny example – we still don’t even really know how it works!! but it’s a mood stabilizer and can be hugely beneficial for managing bipolar disorder. that said, one can attempt to manage bipolar symptoms without medications, but it’s certainly going to be harder and possibly less effective