So glad I can’t see William Clarks name
Didn’t wanna get in trouble; that’s also why I cropped off the part that said “+13525199190”
If you keep being such a privacy respecting king, I’ll build you a guillotine on reflex and have really complicated thoughts about making a facebook account.
All I see is ******* *****
hunter2
Thanks, I got back into my decades-old account.
I’m just here to roast OP for their incredible job at censoring names.
What do you mean? I can’t even read that it says
William ClarkI like to think that was intentional.
Thank you for respecting William Clarks privacy
I’m in the EU. I can go to university and still live above poverty. Communist pigs, how could they do this to me?
Fully censored
I see nothing
the dude is probably wearing camo
All I see is *******
Just looks like
spoiler
“Hunter2”
to me.
Life hack: I told them I was a conscientious objector when I was 18 and never heard from them again.
I was this 🤏 close to joining ROTC and thought real hard if I’d be willing to kill random strangers in exchange for tuition. The debt was worth it.
I also almost joined. Graduated HS slightly after 9/11 and everyone had a huge boner for the military around that time. My buddy joined and referred me. I ultimately decided against it, and it was super annoying when I’d get random calls from recruiters the next like 5 years. They were very persistent. Glad I didn’t join and have to go to Iraq / Afghanistan. I quite enjoy being alive.
Now you can tell random strangers that they owe you tuition and healthcare.
Ladies and gentlemen, we got him
We did it, Lemmy!
So, how do these scumbags even get your number?
My number is on my PsychologyToday page and my NPI profile, so hopefully from there, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they bought it from the university I went to or got access to a government database associated with my license
University is a lot more likely.
They like to prey on people desperate once the bills start rolling in.
The medical school application system, AMCAS, sells the information of every medical school applicant. I had to call the recruiters’ office and explain to them that I have multiple failing organ systems and take more than 10 medications a day. I asked if they could get me a medical waiver for chronic kidney disease and they sheepishly agreed to remove my name from their list.
Everyone and their brother that collects data for something will sell it to the highest bidders
When I was signing up for the army in 2012 they asked me if I knew anyone who might wanna join, I think there was a bonus involved? Anyways I gave them no names or numbers and got nothing, not even the other bonus they promised me.
Never trust army recruiters.
Last one that reached out to me, I asked if I got to wear corporate sponsors of war on my greens like NASCAR does, and they didn’t reply. :(
You never trust the recruiter and always read the contract twice.
So much for airborne school for me…
Specifically for medical stuff, they swipe your number and email when you take the MCAT. I was debating an MD/PhD so I took it and even never applying or getting into med school they’d randomly email me, for like 5y after.
I’m curious, how does one manage to get labelled a terrorist??
Antifa :p
How dare you hypothetically terrorize innocent fascists!
I’d move the word “hypotetically” a bit further, so that it says:
“How dare you terrorize hypotetically inocent fascists!”
There, now it’s better and more accurate. Fuck them fascists. Not a single one is innocent
We found the CEO guys! The Übwnwoken!
Fight terrorists. Say mean things about terrorists. Feed homeless people.
deleted by creator
Those fuckers are desperate, so yeah probably.
“We can fix you ❤️”
Who*
“Whom” is an indirect object pronoun, not a direct object pronoun.
Pronouns! Whom is correct here.
Who / whom works like He / him —
“The Trump administration attempted to label him a terrorist.”
“The Trump administration attempted to label whom a terrorist?”
“He is the person whom the Trump administration attempted to label a terrorist.”
On direct vs indirect object, I’ve heard that before but it doesn’t make sense. None of the other pronouns in English work that way.
Best supporting authority I could find in 15 seconds of looking was Merriam Webster.
You got me. I was taught incorrectly in high school. I always assumed it was the same thing as different pronouns in those particular cases for, as an example Spanish “se” vs “le”. You’ve made me a better member of the alt write, formerly grammar nazis.
