• ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        57
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        Line weight. The round eyes. The color. The exact same smile. Same angles to the viewer. 45 or direct… There are so many telltale signs.

          • Sergio@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            it’s a trap! They throw you in the bus and weld the door shut! #theGulagIsTheBus

          • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            Sure. That’s an AI mistake. I was naming general thematic and design attributes, but composition and content also inform the aware viewer.

        • unalivejoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          When everyone starts using the same style, it’s either everyone’s hiring the same artist (unlikely) or they used AI.

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Honestly the silver lining with all this is how innately obvious it is what it is currently.

        Literally just reeks of the same level of effort as someone making a meme out of clipart or one of those boomers that uses that fancy Facebook status feature.

        If you need to generate a hero image to make your witty tweet good enough to share, maybe go back to the drawing board

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        it’s the exact same style used in almost all ai slop comics lately. you can tell by face alone; it’s almost identical in all of them, even with different features (like facial hair).

        • sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          So these are 2 images I asked AI for, which are admittedly terrible. But beyond that, I’m unsure of the distinguishing features that pegs it as AI. Any guidance (other than never make these images again - for obvious reasons)?

          • pyre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 days ago

            no, I don’t know what you used but this is not what I’m talking about. you can find inconsistencies, colors that don’t make sense, a whole set of issues but that’s AI in general.

            what I’m talking about a very specific style that vaguely apes the ligne claire style of comics, adding an old paper filter and completely lacking soul. they can have zero “errors” and still be recognizable because they are so exact and eerily similar in their style. there’s a difference between a person drawing in a particular style and a machine emulating it.

            You can see these comics on Lemmy from time to time, although it might be getting less common since it gets negative comments every time. I’m pretty sure they come from one particular comic generator. or possibly multiple that use the same underlying model.

            They have the same soulless faces, usually very limited and recognizable facial expressions. i recently saw one with dinosaurs and even they had the exact facial expressions that I’ve seen in other AI slop comics. they also have the same faux lettering font for text.

          • Grimy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            There isn’t a real way to tell anymore other then using ai detector (there are a few free websites). What people are referring to is the specific style chatgpt uses by default when making comics. They are currently the best for generating comics with text, but they overlay their style so the hate isn’t directed towards them. We are very close to having open source tools that can generate full comic pages with text in whatever style asked of it.

          • uzay@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            If you look at the details, there are signs, like structures or geometry that don’t make sense or aren’t aligned properly. Things an artist with intent would have no reason to draw that way.

          • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            In the First image, there’s a yellow tint that chatgpt absolutely loves to always apply to everything. White is never white

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      What’s crazy is I instantly clocked it as AI slop just from the thumbnail, and I’m not even wearing my glasses.

      • Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        It just all has a kind of bland sameyness to it all that once you see it you can spot it immediately in subsequent images.

    • DashboTreeFrog@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      In a different AI comic conversation someone used the term “slop sepia” and I hope it catches on.

      The term, not the slop

  • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 days ago

    If you insist on posting Ai slop outside of the dedicated Ai communities please at least tag it so people can filter Ai slop out.

  • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Probably could have left out the words “without due process” because they should not be throwing people into an El Salvadorian gulag.

      • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Idk it kinda feels like the implication is that if you have due process, then this would be okay. I’m firmly in the camp that nobody should be shipped to an El Salvador Gulag for any reason

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          nobody should be shipped to an El Salvador Gulag for any reason

          With this I agree.

          I don’t see it implied to be ok, this contradiction of something that is not normal being part of an ‘advertisement’ was what I found funny

  • Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’m not even going to look at it, I can tell it’s ai slop from the thumbnail.

    • LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      I don’t even know what it is. Ive stared at it for at least a solid two minutes looking for errors. It screams AI to me but I cant find that detail that proves it. I hate that this is what sharing pictures online has become. Scrutinizing every little detail to see if I should care or not.

      • SourGumGum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        Scrutinizing every little detail to see if I should care or not.

        You don’t have to do that? It’s only a picture, the world won’t end if you upvote something made by AI.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yeah same, I think a human artist would have put a door on that bus. But it’s not proof.

      • howrar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        There’s nothing about this image that can tell you with certainty that it’s AI generated, but it’s an art style that has been popular with AI generated images recently, probably due to the simplicity, which makes it harder for it to make mistakes. The trend means that a lot of junk has been showing up with this style and people have a negative association with it now.

  • don@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 days ago

    We will, however, throw you into an El Salvadorian gulag with due process!

    :/

  • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    I always respected that Canada is open to almost everyone…

    Except if you have a DUI

    I knew a lady that was a Canadian citizen but lived and worked in Seattle. She got a DUI in the US and they won’t let her go back into Canada until she completes the long and expensive process that they require for DUI offenders.

    • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      I dunno, DUI is serious, you could kill someone. Maybe it is a long and expensive process to make sure people will remember it and not drive while being drunk?

      • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 days ago

        I always figured it was a good line in the sand telling some Americans, they are not welcome

        drunk driving is serious and I respect that they treat it as such

        • DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          9 days ago

          Looking at their rules for it, it actually seems kinda fucked: One bad choice years ago bars you for life unless you are wealthy enough to go through their process and hire lawyers, it’s a even crime to try and enter, but that is definitely not a widely known fact, so even though someone might have paid their dues and even been completely sober for years, they’re still fucked unless they’re well off.

          I get wanting to protect people and stop dangerous driving but effectively banning someone for life if they made a mistake and happen to be poor seems a bit unfair. You can bet your ass rich people have all sorts of ways around this that completely circumvent the system anyhow on top of all that.

          As usual, it’s another regulation that disproportionately affects poor people who are unable to afford proper legal representation to begin with (and are more likely to be falsely convicted of a DUI in the first place).

        • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          until she completes the long and expensive process that they require for DUI offenders.

          Sounds like there’s a path to forgiveness, it’s just not cheap or easy. Which, why should it be? She drove under the influence and could have killed someone.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      That’s ridiculous. You can deny someone a driving licence, but you can’t deny them entry to the country they’re a citizen of.

      • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Yes. It is that thing. Gotta have a gulag committee.

        Edit: oh my fuck i thought that was sarcasm, do people really not even think of just not doing the atrocity bad thing ever, just not ever buildibg and maintaining that capacity?

        Like, i don’t have a process for deciding which neighbors I’m going to vivisect while they have a bad drug trip and are sexually assaulted in new and horrible ways before i throw them into my dungeon where i do psychological sadism to them and chop bits off until there’s nothing left but some mostly denatured cardiac muscle and a spine.

        Would be fucking creepy if i did. I hope none of my neighbors spend a second on thinking of doing that to me. It woukd be, perhaos, profoundly disturbing if anyone ever seriously considered, or even fantasized about, doing this to me. You understand that, right? Right?

        • NoFun4You@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Would you rather a gulag committee or no gulag committee lol. Ppl want children to spend their whole life’s in prison for making mistakes before their brain is fully developed… I’d say a committee is a much better compromise than letting agents like that represent immigration-or whatever the fuck they’re doing in the us-to make decisions.

          • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            The thought of just not having a gulag, of taking that option off the table entirely, genuinely does not occur to you?

            Assuming a true statement, the last line in OP adds people to the torture prison