• NotSteve_@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    28 days ago

    Everything after the ? can be safely removed

    This is usually true but but not always. There’s often times when a URL query like that is used to choose the page to load. I believe wordpress does this

    • kungen@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      Only on “I have really bad SEO” kinds of blogs. Query strings have been considered a negative thing for many many years.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        27 days ago

        whuh? querystrings are integral to things like pagination. they are by no means a negative thing.

          • keegomatic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            27 days ago

            Pagination query params can be in the URL params, but that’s not normal at all. They’re pretty much always use query params, and it’s very reasonable to do so. Filtering, search, and pagination all typically go in query params.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      WordPress uses a taxonomic system you choose with a mix of the Settings page and how you organize your template hierarchy. To my knowledge there is no out of the box query url functionality in the core system.

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      27 days ago

      Right? The fact that this is an extra bit of tracking information I don’t want makes this an easy sell for anyone looking for a reason to do this, but for me it’s because it just makes links uglier.

  • kieron115@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    If you’re still using firefox, right click -> copy clean link. works most of the time.

    edit: on desktop, idk if mobile supports it or not. Good suggestions below though for mobile.

  • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    27 days ago

    They are called query parameters and they are used for other things as well. So you can remove the ones you see similar to these but sometimes there might be important stuff you need to get the page to load in those parameters.

    • bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      26 days ago

      After removing them (or even if there was nothing to remove) I test out links I’m sending in a private browser window to check that they would work for other people.

  • dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    This is kinda true but also kinda fear mongering. UTM parameters are just to track where you clicked the link from. They’re usually not dynamic, and don’t contain anything about you personally. The example in the screenshot utm_source=newsletter is probably added to all links in a company’s newsletter email, so they can tell that people get to the page via the newsletter.

  • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    27 days ago

    Most of my internetin’ is done on mobile, because I’m very rarely at my desk, and when I am, I’m normally working on school. Are there any solutions to handling this easily on mobile without having to manually erase part of the pasted link when I go to send it to someone? A few people have mentioned that’s it’s not 100% guaranteed that the anything after ? Is worthless, so I don’t know how to ensure I’m not breaking a link

  • over_clox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    This belongs more on Technology and Privacy communities.

    For Android users at least, I recommend the Léon URL Cleaner app, when you share a link from many common sources to the URL Cleaner, it removes all that tracking shit for you, and copies the cleaned link to the clipboard.

    • sk1nnym1ke@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      This belongs more on Technology and Privacy communities.

      I guess it was posted here to reach a broader audience.

      • Novaling@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        I’m upset, the tech and privacy communities need to step it up cause I’ve never seen this fact. I kinda knew URLs had a lot of junk, but I never knew what could be removed.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      It is correct and factual. Unfortunately it doesn’t really explain anything. There’s plenty of situations where you wouldn’t want to delete content because they are necessary for functionality.