• macniel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    bottom, as we only can see the treads not the risers (that small inset underneath a step).

    • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      And you can see the wear on the treads. plus the handrail mount in the top left would be at a very inconvenient height if we were looking from the bottom up

      • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The handrail argument doesn’t make any sense. It would be at the same height regardless of direction.

      • Obinice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s at the top, I have that same bannister mount, it points upwards to the banister.

        The mattress is wedged at the top of the stairs thanks to its extreme springiness.

        • Brown5500@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          This is what gets me confused. If we’re at the top, I see the banister mount turning horizontal, not up. Up from that POV would be towards the viewer, but it’s angled away which would be horizontal. We have to be looking from the bottom for it to be turning up in this photo. I have no idea how hundreds of people look at that and say it’s turning up.

          E: nevermind, the question asked where the mattress is, not where I am looking from. 🤣

    • YoFrodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s the top of the stairs because in the top left of thr image you can see the banister support. If the mattresses were at the bottom then the angle of that support would be different

    • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I think it’s bottom too but I don’t agree with your reasoning, I’ve seen steps without that bit.

      Edit: actually now I think top, I’ve been convinced by the daylight argument plus the realization that is a single mattress folded in half (I previously thought it’s two mattresses).

      Edit: changed my mind again, made a top level comment

      • papalonian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        How does the single mattress in half bit make you think it’s at the top? If it were at the top, the force of the mattress trying to straighten itself out would push it down the stairs. Much more likely the mattress was pushed/ tossed/ fell down the stairs and got folded in that position, imo.

        Edit: the shadows are also indicative of it being at the bottom: light source from above and and from the sides at the base of the stairs, either from an open door or window. Shadow cast from the door light source being cancelled by the light source from above the stairs.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Some stairs don’t have different looking risers, but you’re still correct because you can see wear marks from steps on the carpet.

          • deranger@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Well, my house has electricity and the stairs do not have that indentation at all. I could take a picture of the steps from the bottom or the top and aside from the wear marks on the treads, you can’t see a difference.