I’m sorry but it doesn’t make sense TO ME. Based on what I was taught, regardless of the month, I think what matters first is to know what day of the month you are in, if at the beginning, in the middle or at the end of said month. After you know that, you can find out the month to know where you are in the year.

What is the benefit of doing it the other way around?

EDIT: To avoid misunderstandings:

  • I am NOT making fun OF ANYONE.
  • I am NOT negatively judging ANYTHING.
  • I am totally open to being corrected and LEARN.
  • This post is out of pure and honest CURIOSITY.

So PLEASE, don’t take it the wrong way.

  • kmartburrito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 month ago

    As an American it was just what we were taught. However, when I started creating code and being pedantic about organizing files by date, I now prefer YYYYMMDD format as it is, chronologically speaking, superior when prefacing files with it. In this case, in my opinion, it’s better to have the year and then month first prior to day.

    To each their own, variety is the spice of life.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is the only format that truly makes sense, as it is both unambiguous and, as you noted, sortable.

    • NONE@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      What you say is interesting. Having a way of organizing time that suits your needs. That’s why I asked if there was any benefit in the way Americans (and apparently also Chinese) represent time.

      • ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Interesting thing about how Chinese time is organized is locations are also stated big to small. Last names then first names etc.

          • ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I mean the larger family name comes before the personal name. Implying a connection between number, place, and naming sequences

            • ghu@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Chinese is also weird imho. If I remember correctly, they put the details of an action first in a sentece and the verb that defines the action itself goes last with some exceptions.

              Hungarian comes to my mind which is similar and always follows the context first, details later rule. They use “yyyy.mm.dd.”, “family name first, given name last”, “country, city, street, street number order for locations”, and the word order of their grammar is similar too, details are always at the end of the sentence.

              • ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                You’re thinking of Japanese not Chinese. Chinese grammar is more similar to English.

                That’s interesting about Hungarian though!

  • IttihadChe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Because the month is bigger and provides more context on it’s own. You figure out the month first then place yourself within that scale.

    Example:

    “It’s May (immediately tells us the context of 31days, spring, etc.) It is the 30th, so there’s one day left in May”

    Vs

    “It’s the 30th (provides no context except that it’s not February). it’s may, so there’s one day left in May”

    So both lead to the same conclusion, the first way just gives the limiting parameter/most context first.

    Similar reasoning why the month is the primary separation on calendars.

    Another example that follow this same principle, you tell time HH/mm to provide the larger context first, not mm/HH.

    • red_concrete@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      you tell time HH/mm to provide the larger context first, not mm/HH.

      Except not everywhere does, at least in speech. Half past ten. Quarter to eight. Five past three.

      Although in the US I suppose you do say ten thirty, and seven forty-five? So at least you are consistent!

    • dan1101@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      This pretty much sums it up for me, knowing the month first conveys a lot of information. Then the specific day gives more precision, year you can often assume but it’s there in case it’s not what you expected.

  • mercano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    Most significant digits first. You write the thousands place before the hundreds, you write the month before the day. Of course, the whole argument is blow away when you write the year at the end instead of the beginning. (ISO YYYY-MM-DD dates for the win.)

    • communism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Most significant digits first.

      That would only make sense if the US wrote the year first, but they don’t. They just seem to slap the date together in a random order

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think that’s context relevant though. If we think about when dates are most frequently used (news, business, planning) it’s typically within the year (or month will give context).

        That added with the fact it’s not uncommon in some situations to just provide month/day.

        That being said, I don’t think either is better or worse. Just a preference kinda thing, unlike the issue between metric and imperial units.

  • Montagge@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Because the day doesn’t matter when you work every day between your three jobs that won’t give you 40 hours in order to not give you health insurance.

  • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    The short answer is, it’s what we were taught in school. Like many preferences, it’s shaped by the culture we grow up and live in.

    I’m sorry but it doesn’t make sense to me.

    Of course not, you were raised and live in a different culture; so, your preferences are different.

    Ultimately, the right answer is ISO8601. It’s unambiguous and sorts well on computers. But, I don’t think any culture is teaching that as the primary way to write dates, so we’re stuck with the crappy ways.

  • Jentu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Year is the most significant (read: big) unit in the list, but it is the least significant (pertinent to daily life) unless you’re a time traveler. Of month and day, month is more significant than day in both size and pertinence, so it gets ordered first. But when sorting things into folders or file naming conventions, biggest category descending down to smaller categories is always the best.

    • beastlykings@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      You articulated what I was thinking, better than I could have. This is it for me.

      I’d add that there’s probably a lot of habit involved, plus the fact that everyone else does it.

      So not only am I not used to saying “today is the 4th of May”, everyone around me isn’t used to hearing it either and might think I’m being weird.

  • harsh3466@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Am American and I hate the MM/DD/YY(YY) format. Unfortunately its what’s been taught and used as the standard date format for a long time.

    I much prefer the ISO standard of YYYY-MM-DD. It’s the superior format logically moving from the largest calendar unit to the smallest. Also superior for date ordering files.

  • JargonWagon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    American here. No idea. Either DD/MM/YYYY or YYYY/MM/DD are more logical, but here we are. When naming/renaming files and including a date in the name, I’ll usually do YYYYMMDD format somewhere. If I’m emailing/texting others, I use MM/DD/YYYY.

    Fun little story, the department I work in recently began to work with some people over in the UK, and even though I brought up the date format differences, we’ve already had someone of gett the month and day flipped and it caused some confusion on our end.

  • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I can’t say it matters to me that much what order it’s in, but that’s just the same order we say it in when fully written out. March 23, 2025. 03/23/2025.

  • That_Devil_Girl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I write the date a bit different depending on which format its going on.

    For example, computers like to sort things alphabetically. If I’m writing electronic diary entries, I’ll name the document as “2025-06-01.”

    If I’m hand signing a legal document, I prefer to sign it as “01JUN2025” or “01JUN25” if space is an issue.

    If the format is preselected and deviation isn’t allowed, I’ll just write it like everyone else does.

    Personally, I like dating things in ascending or descending order. Day month year, or year month day.

    • NONE@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Personally, I like dating things in ascending or descending order

      Hey! Me too! 🤝

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t have a clue why we do MM-DD-YYYY and personally I hate how dates are done in the west, to a degree.

    For a maths course I’ve been taking at college, I never use MM-DD in my notebook because that and DD-MM are stupid in my opinion. I always spell out the month first to ensure I don’t get mixed up. I honestly envy that some languages like Chinese and Japanese have an individual character to help distinguish between month and day.

    Also, I would love if every country using the MM-DD or vice versa format could all agree on which format to use for everyday things.

  • arthur@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Probably because in english it’s the way they speak about dates (and the fact US kinda isolated themselves before WWII).

    They started to write dates as they speak dates.

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    To make sure its not December right away. Fuck that entire month. Everyone hates December so much they throw the years biggest party at the end of it.

  • John@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Generally we say June 1, not 1 June or 1st of June… So 6/1 makes complete sense.

    For anything “official”, like a work spreadsheet, I’ll use ISO format YYYY-MM-DD for clarity and ease of filtering/sorting.

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Who is “we”? Americans? I usually hear Americans say “June 1st,” not “June 1.”

      • John@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        We meaning USAians, since we’re the kinda the only ones who use Month-Day

        It’s just an example. We say June first, that’s why we write 6/1

        • jsomae@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Not ignoring their point – I agree with the explanation for 6/1, but that’s not relevant here. Genuinely am not sure if they were from an area where they say “1” instead of “1st.”

          • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            The “st” is implied, it’s just one of those things you have to get used to. Like reading prices here, it looks like “$25”, but you would read it as “twenty-five dollars.” No one says “it costs dollar-sign twenty five.”