Mozilla Corp., which manages the open-source Firefox browser, announced today that Mitchell Baker is stepping down as CEO to focus on AI and internet safety as chair of the nonprofit foundation. Laura Chambers, a Mozilla board member and entrepreneur with experience at Airbnb, PayPal, and eBay, will step in as interim CEO to run operations until a permanent replacement is found.

https://archive.is/rmMEb

Official Blog Post: A New Chapter for Mozilla: Focused Execution and an Expanded Role in Charting the Internet’s Future

  • ferralcat@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Reading this new CEOs job history on linkedin is kinda infuriating. She goes from intern to head of consumer products at Skype in less than a year. Just… Frustrating to read that while I am and manage really good people who struggle for decades in the trenches to get even paltry job opportunities.

    But she got her MBA from Stanford so nepotism ahoy I guess.

    • anar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah. “Airbnb, Paypal, and ebay” doesn’t inspire confidance either

    • Joker@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      How is getting an MBA from Stanford nepotism? She probably worked her ass off not only to earn the degree but to be accepted to the university in the first place. Without knowing anything about her, I’m going to assume she’s a total rockstar until there’s a good reason to believe otherwise.

        • Snapz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Biggest predictor of future success is the zip code you’re born into.

          To your specific point, the preponderance of PERCEIVED hard work in the nepotism community is definitely worth mentioning. Hard work, as an objective measure, would be the exception in this camp.

        • Joker@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Where is the evidence of nepotism? The person I replied to mentioned the Stanford degree and immediately jumped to the conclusion that it all comes down to nepotism. Frankly, it sounds like jealousy and taking cheap shots at someone who is doing well. I don’t understand it. Why knock someone else down? She’s successful so good for her. My own success will only come from me. What someone else did or did not achieve or how they did it is irrelevant to what I achieve.

        • abbenm@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          okay but still where is the nepotism? You’ve commented on the general hypothetical possibility of nepotism not having been dis-proven.

          Being at Stanford in and of itself is not nepotism so it’s a pretty fair question to those of us who want words to mean things.

        • dditty@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          The MBA would immediately toss 5 crayons from the box and announce they’re only going to color with the remaining 10, collect a bonus, and then take a vacation after a hard days work.

  • Caravaggio@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    “Mozilla now makes most of its almost $600 million in annual revenue from promoting Chrome as the default search engine on its home page.”

    Proofreading FTW.

    • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Chrome is just the internet, duh. Do you not support the internet? I have two internets on my computer, in case the first goes down or something. But the one internet hasn’t had any issues, I just keep the second as a backup.

      – anyone in US govt

  • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    They should focus more on their mobile browser. At this point the desktop browser is on par with Chrome. People who use Chrome does it because they don’t care enough about privacy, but on mobile there is a noticeable difference between their performances.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think they need to integrate better with their paid offerings to build additional revenue streams. For example, Mozilla VPN works with Container Tabs, but I had to look for it; that’s a pretty killer feature IMO. Make it work on mobile too and a lot of people would be interested. Maybe they could white label a password manager (Bitwarden?) as an alternative to their built-in PW manager service, and make the experience really good. Throw in Relay as well.

      There’s a lot they could do with opt-in, privacy-centric features that I would be totally interested in.

      • kewjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Maybe they could white label a password manager (Bitwarden?)

        not sure starting at which version, but in android you can set bitwarden as a default password manager system wide which integrates pretty seamlessly with firefox and other apps. only place i know bitwarden doesn’t really integrate well with firefox is on Linux but that seems more due to bitwardens lack of interest to implement freedesktop apis.

        i agree though with additional revenue streams, they need to break dependence on Google search engine revenue. maybe spend research on alternative monitization to ads and sponsored content that could be implemented at a browser level and split revenue between browser and websites.

      • WetBeardHairs@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        They will in the EU. Hopefully it’s easy to game the system and sideload a non-safari browser in the future.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Honestly I think its the opposite. The UI on desktop look awful and is clunky. The mobile version is nice and pleasant.

      • Mike D.@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I use FF and the desktop and don’t care about the look of the UI. I’m happy FF is fast and doesn’t have memory leaks.

        Making the mobile experience better will go further with helping Mozilla in general than making the desktop UI look pretty.

  • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I am a big fan of Firefox+Thunderbird and subscribe to Pocket, Mozilla VPN and Firefox Relay. I don’t think she was the right CEO for the job, coming into the job because she was needed after the Eich debacle, not because she was the best choice. When I listened or read interviews with her I sensed a lack of focus, which I think came through with the lack of focus and commitment I sense in Firefox’s products. She seems like a better fit for chair of the foundation, pursuing pie in the sky ideas rather than in the trenches trying to rebuild Mozilla’s presence and diversify their revenues. Pocket has stagnated under their care, and actually grown less useful to the point I am considering switching. The Android browser is stuck in time. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that Thunderbird has flourished after pursuing a semi-independent structure: they finally had people who actually cared about the product calling the shots.

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Congratulations to Mozilla Corp on escaping its CEO. Another one will inevitably move in, but perhaps it will be someone easier to bear.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    hi new CEO, any plans to update Thunderbird to look like it was made within the last decade?

        • jackeryjoo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yes. People got to eat.

          They’re legit companies, but they do not operate with the goal of profit. Profit is something they may make, and in many cases it’s good so they can survive losses of funding or the like.

          It also means they get certain tax advantages because they are not solely focused on profit

        • Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Yesm It is weird, but it would be impossible for a foundation to develop complex software like a Web browser. Engineers cost.

            • Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              They are skins over someone else’s browser.

              KDE’s Konqueror uses Qt WebEngine, which is developed by the Qt Company and is based on Google:s Chromium.

              GNOME’s Epiphany uses WebKit, developed by Apple.

              Trisquel’s Abrowser is a rebranded Mozilla Firefox.

              • darkpanda@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Ironically, all of these things except Abrowser are based on Konqueror’s original engine, KHTML, so Konqueror was actually the OG engine. KHTML was forked to WebKit, which was forked to Blink, which became the underpinnings of Qt WebEngine, which Konqueror now uses.

                This is also why KHTML still appears in the user agent strings for all of these engines, but back in the day the Gecko engine used in Mozilla products was already a thing and KHTML was the alternative to that, hence “KHTML, like Gecko”.