Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is suing Johnson and Johnson, accusing the pharmaceutical company of failing to warn consumers about the risk of taking Tylenol while pregnant.

This lawsuit, the first of its kind from a state government, comes a month after President Donald Trump and U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. announced updated guidance discouraging pregnant women from taking acetaminophen, citing it as a possible cause of autism. The announcement set off a wave of controversy in the health care community, and confusion among pregnant women unsure how they should manage fever and pain during pregnancy.

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m not a lawyer but shouldn’t J&J be suing the Federal Government for making utterly unsubstantiated claims in an official announcement?

  • Wilco@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    It is hard to believe this is not an onion article. “We just made this up and now we are suing you for not warning people about the shit we just made up”.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I can’t wait for all these bullshit cases to get in front of judges. Some of them already have, and are getting tossed. The media should be covering it much heavier.

      • Wilco@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes, but no. Justice is expensive in the US. The legal system HATES pro se litigants (people that represent themselves), making it harder for them to get paperwork through the courts.

        Those who do have “big money” lawsuits will get represented by ambulance chasing law firms.

        People yell about Medicare for all, but the US really needs constitutionally guaranteed legal representation.

    • justsomeguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      They don’t. It’s part flood the zone, part pandering to certain voters. Look what we do for you! A blue state wouldn’t fight for your health like this!

      Nothing will come of it but it’s a positive distraction from the extraction of wealth that is currently happening.

    • thesohoriots@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      People have tried in the past and each time it got thrown out because the judges ruled they were full of shit. As recently as 2023, even, from Reuters:

      Cote, in a 148-page ruling, found that none of the five expert witnesses proposed by the plaintiffs had offered a sound scientific methodology to support their opinion that Tylenol’s active ingredient, acetaminophen, could cause autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

      “Instead, the unstructured approach adopted by the plaintiffs’ experts permitted cherry-picking, allowed a results-driven analysis, and obscured the complexities, inconsistencies, and weaknesses in the underlying data,” she wrote.

    • HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’re trying to sue J&J, too. One of the largest corporations in the world. Curious to see where it’ll go. Just seems like all it’ll do is piss off his donors.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Honestly they probably expect a settlement to avoid “political trouble.”

      This is how recent federal lawsuits ended.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Exactly. Like Republicans in 2020 wouldn’t bring any election denial claims to court cause the had no actual evidence

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      These folks never change their views after a court case disproves something. They just assume some sort of deep state is in bed with “big pharma” - even if acetaminophen is a low cost and not a big money maker.

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    If there is a civil war, I suspect that Tylenol would be on the side of the Allies & Union. Texans and MAGA will have to use homeopathic remedies to (not) ease their pain.

  • MyOpinion@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    I hear that MAGA hats have chemicals that leach into your brain and make you a complete idiot.

      • SippyCup@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        For instance, the correlation between Tylenol and autism.

        Because there is a correlation. Tylenol is shown to be the most effective tool for combating fevers during pregnancy. And as it happens a high fever during pregnancy is also correlated with an increased incidence of autism. And since that was true prior to Tylenol existing, I’m sure if either of them has anything to do with it, it’s the fever.

        • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          if the whole Tylenol thing causes pregnant women to suffer through more fever and that causes more autism… well, laugh is the wrong adjective but the irony would be in abundance

  • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Many have tried, and many have failed to sue them due to a lack of evidence.

    There has been no new evidence btw.

  • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is what happens when you put conspiracy theorists into office: You get them suing or attacking organisations for things that aren’t real.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Worst of all is that this probably will end in a settlement where the US government gets to claim they were right in exchange for just a “small” donation to the US government

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      That’s what colleges and networks were doing for a while, but since Kimmel stood up to them and won BIG, potential victims have been pushing back. Colleges are refusing money with strings, for one thing.

      If J&J is smart (and it’s not clear that they are, although they are well-established to be evil), they’ll refuse to settle.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    This is upsetting to me.

    I’m barely grasping my spot on the AuADHD space, and now it’s been politicized into a single dimensional disease Republicans are using to virtue signal, like the whole vaccine “debate.”

    And I’m in freaking Texas. It’s not as Republican as y’all think, especially in the big metros, but somehow we got Paxton in.


    And apparently you guys forgot about previous frivolous lawsuits. Huge media conglomerates, and other institutions, settled with the Trump DoJ because they saw them for what they are: a shake down. “Pay us, or you will find political trouble.”

    That’s what’s happening.

    The merits do not matter. There is no “fight” here.

    J&J is going to settle with Texas and maybe others so MAGA doesn’t persecute them outside the lawsuit.

    • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I feel ya, and feel for ya. Good luck and help it together, looking forward to cleaning up with you all after this Cheeto colored fuck dies.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I mean, that’s not going to change anything. We’re in the misinformation era.

        Even some Democrat parts of my family share weird shit they get from cable TV or Facebook or influencers or what have you. Frankly, a disturbing amount of Lemmy.world’s front page is clickbait from literal tabloids, too discredited for Wikipedia to even cite, that mods do nothing about because information hygiene only matters when it’s against their ideology.

        Meanwhile, my other internet communities have withered away or got swallowed into Discord black holes


        Sorry for that mini rant, but as far as I’m concerned the world had shown me attention, not truth, is all that matters. It’s not getting better. And that’s just how things will be from now on.

        Hence I don’t like ‘personal’ issues getting dragged into the US two party food fight because it blows out any nuance away, forever. Tylenol will forever be a autism meme no matter how much it’s disproved, especially in the face of small grains of truth.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Johnson and Johnson is a huge, multinational pharma company with more money than God. They aren’t going to be intimidated or extorted by this dumbass governor.

    This case will get tossed in the discovery phase when the judge asks for scientific evidence and all the governor can provide are these whoo-whoo dipsh*t theories.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’re being sneaky.

      As attorney general, Paxton has a different avenue into court than an individual trying to prove that Tylenol caused their child’s autism. While those lawsuits focus on personal injury claims, this suit hinges on two state consumer protection laws, the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act and the Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

      “That overlaps a lot with the science and with the argument that is going on about Tylenol right now, but it’s ultimately a different burden of proof and different damages that we’re going to be seeking,” Keller said.

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    So glad I left that shithole state. Tired of Ken “Securities Fraud” Paxton wasting my tax dollars on frivolous bullshit like this.

  • laserm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    This timeline is so fucked that J & J somehow managed to be the good guy for once…

    • phx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Pharma. Regardless of who’s involved, being able to sue somebody based on made up bullshit is not a good precedent

      • Aspharr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes, but when was the last time these guys cared about “precedent”? I agree in thinking Pharma wins, but only because money. One CEO visit to the Whitehouse and some brown nosing and Trump will start saying how they’re “good people”.

        We have always been at war with Eastasia.