SSUPII@sopuli.xyz to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agomonthly challengesopuli.xyzimagemessage-square86fedilinkarrow-up1211arrow-down19
arrow-up1202arrow-down1imagemonthly challengesopuli.xyzSSUPII@sopuli.xyz to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square86fedilink
minus-squareNikls94@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down2·1 month ago no, I prefer the sex no, I hate when I can’t fly freestyle yes no, not enough ok is easy, I have a dog doable not on this economy
minus-squarebluecat_OwO@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 month agothey meant less than 500 steps a day smh
minus-squareNikls94@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 month agoWho writes it that way??? It’s read out “500 less than steps a day” Favorite subject of them grammar not was.
minus-squareAlfredolin@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 month agoI think <500 steps a day is meant here.
minus-squareMBech@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 month ago500> steps and <500 steps means the exact same thing though.
minus-squareAlfredolin@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoYes thank you. However the comment above seems to imply the opposite.
minus-squareMBech@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoYes, that part is right, above comment doesn’t know how to read ‘greater than’ symbols.
they meant less than 500 steps a day
smh
Who writes it that way???
It’s read out “500 less than steps a day”
Favorite subject of them grammar not was.
500 greater than steps a day.
I think <500 steps a day is meant here.
500> steps and <500 steps means the exact same thing though.
Yes thank you. However the comment above seems to imply the opposite.
Yes, that part is right, above comment doesn’t know how to read ‘greater than’ symbols.