• 1 Post
  • 16 Comments
Joined 9 days ago
cake
Cake day: August 3rd, 2025

help-circle















  • So first of all, What:

    • Simple predicate logic
    • who decides the logic? open standards anyone who has a point can draft a point or share their idea
    • I know it will be hard, time consuming and very tedious, but it’s just an Idea, not like those in power would ever relinquish it so easily.

    secondly, I have read about EU laws and it is very challenging but unlike that case, system implemented here would be very fluid, law’s validity period is determined by 2 things:

    1. People’s choices
    2. it’s relevance as decided by the system during polling Which would still not make this system very democratic in a sense but it would really just be distributed AI autocracy, at least the way I see it, its similar to local AI overlords ruling us.

    I think there can be many more standards that can be implemented to keep the system bias proof and strongly ethical.

    One tangential question I had was:

    • If LLM’s logic is structural and derivable, even though complex then why aren’t algorithms and models tend towards rule based predictions like black scholes model and mdp, or am I just a newbie and hasn’t seen enough and I am out of my depth again

  • Setup a simple priority queue for decision making. Say for example in my country, heavy rainfall affects the grocery prices a lot. So during these times in many extreme conditions, families have to skip meals. Thus government should drop ideas of economic growth for a minute and help setup infrastructure that can prevent such panic situations. This is a simple decision that demonstrates what I meant.

    Plus the systems top most priority should be its citizens health above all. So any policies about hurting poor would be out of the box. Plus points for policies that implement education, awareness and healthcare for the masses, while tackling the economic frontier and defense frontiers.

    The weights to the problems would be assigned based on polling and similar ideas.