• SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    21 days ago

    Since when did keeping kids off of porn sites become everyone else’s problem and not the problem of parents? Oh, right, that’s just a bullshit reason to make accessing porn more difficult and a security risk since they can’t just make porn illegal.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      It’s not even that. Porn is just a bystander here. The first step is put in place a very large framework for making some form of verification mandatory on arbitrary services and sites under the guise of whatever (terrorism, child protection, and extremely niche content are good candidates). Once it’s in place, it becomes the new normal very quickly.

      Then, as the government, you suddenly have the power to extend the provision of said system to whatever the fuck you want. That’s where things gets funky, and not the good kind.

      • bizarroland@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        And look at the money.

        The reasoning for this is to eventually lock the internet down completely to put up fences and paywalls everywhere to every single site so that even if you pay for the privilege of using the internet, you will have to pay more money to actually use the internet.

        It is all about controlling you and taking every single penny they possibly can out of your pocket.

        All of the tracking, all of the identity verification, all of the invasive watching every single thing you do on your computer and your phone, everywhere, all of the time always, is all about milking you for every single penny they can.

        Even though they are insanely rich, beyond the imagination of any human being that has ever lived in the hundreds of thousands of years of humanity’s existence on this planet they still don’t have enough money and they will still never be satisfied with how much money they have.

        The fact that there are free websites where people can congregate and communicate and have fun with each other without paying them for the privilege galls them.

        It grinds their heart and soul the way watching a dog get shot in the head at the end of old yeller does to a normal person.

        These people are evil, and we need to stop them.

        When it comes down to it, we may have to rise up and slay them.

          • bizarroland@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 days ago

            I’m not saying that we should start getting pitchforks or anything right now. I’m just saying that like, they need to know that that is an option and that if they keep pushing us, they’re gonna start painting targets on their own back.

            I mean, that’s two billionaires down in a year, and they’re still ramping things up. Next year, it’ll be four. The year after that, it’ll be eight. And in like 15 years, we won’t have any billionaires left unless they fucking straighten up an act right.

          • Mirror Giraffe@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 days ago

            Sometimes they will act if they fear for their moneys.

            With that said it bothers me that they will always look to strike a deal with the more pacifist/less disruptive parts of a movement in order to neutralise the threat.

            Which in theory means it’s useless to actually aim for a reasonable goal but rather you need to overshoot by a fair bit in order for the deal to land anywhere near what you believe is decent.

            BUT when you overshoot you come across as disillusioned and a lot of people will distance from you, making any movement impossible.

      • brax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        That’s when the databases become huge targets and the government officials get their everything leaked online. They voted against privacy, they can enjoy the stones they threw in the glass house they forced themselves into.

      • 4am@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        “Oh look, we just banned all the opposition party from using any online services at all because (checks notes) campaigning against us is hate speech

        All you EU chatters going on about us in the US sitting on our asses and not doing anything about what’s going are gonna eat your fucking words if you don’t show us how it’s done, and quick, because they’re coming for you HARD right now

    • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      It’s more than that, they want to

      1. limit who can post and make money off porn, and no, this isn’t to support small creators at all unfortunately
      2. build massive blackmail networks
      3. build massive sex work websites with curated AI models and videos

      And yes, any time ANY ONE EVER says, “Do it for the kids, just think of the kids,” when it is not something DIRECTLY and CONSENSUALLY helping kids, but instead FORCING ADULTS TO DO THINGS, is being manipulative every time.

      • bizarroland@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 days ago

        The only time the phrase “do it for the kids” is actually valuable is when it’s someone asking you to grill hot dogs at a picnic.

        If it’s a politician saying it, “do it for the kids” is slang for “bend over and take it up the ass because otherwise you’re a bad person”.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      I think the narrative is now that “parenting is hard” and you can’t expect parents to do it right by themselves. Parenting used to be easy so parents didn’t need any help but now it’s just too difficult and government needs to help.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        Parenting used to be easy so parents didn’t need any help but now it’s just too difficult and government needs to help.

        Ahh ok, so that means they’re for parental leave, and free daycare/preschool, right?

        And surely they’ll do something to lower the maternal and infant mortality rates, right?

        And they’ll definitely make sure that we’re teaching proper sex education, and making contraceptives free and widely available in order to lower the rate of unwanted pregnancies, right?

        Right??

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    21 days ago

    wow, they actually, properly, fully did this shit. Amazing.

    So glad I left that shithole. My friends are aparantly using VPNs, which is the same fucking thing I had to use to access WIKIPEDIA in TURKEY.

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    21 days ago

    I hope he sues and wins

    I don’t want to know anything more about this man other than he has a lot of tattoos, likes porn, and isn’t afraid to say it.

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        20 days ago

        I’m sure he could probably figure out a VPN or a site that doesn’t give a fuck about UK law, but chose to stir shit anyway.

        • BearGun@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 days ago

          Well it at least seems he doesn’t care about privacy, if he chose to upload a selfie to get past the check.

          • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            20 days ago

            He also gave an interview about the experience of failing to upload his selfie. I think you’re right about him not caring about his privacy.

  • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    21 days ago

    King Of Ink Land King Body Art The Extreme Ink-Ite has written to his local MP to air his grievances.

    Holy shit. That’s his legal name?!

    For King of Ink Land, this is particularly tricky as the system believes he’s wearing a mask – but it’s actually his tattoo-covered face.

    So is it first name ‘King of Ink Land’, last name ‘King Body Art The Extreme Ink-Ite’? Or is there a middle name in there?

    The King of Ink Land, who is now considering using a VPN, was attempting to access a live webcam site when the issue arose.

    Whoa whoa whoa. “The” King of Ink Land? That’s his name, not a title!

    Godspeed, King of Ink Land. I sincerely wish you success in this fight.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 days ago

    He knows that video games where you can pose the character can bypass it, right?

    Iirc death stranding and a few others have been shown to work.

    Alternatively VPNs work.

    Or piracy.

  • paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    They just need to support alternate verification paths for people like him, and people who have otherwise been disfigured.

    They should sue for discrimination if steps are not quickly taken to support their situations.

    It’s funny how this turns into the gov needing to provide equal access to porn.