• Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Henceforth, $1 shall cost $1. Inflation solved.

    Does this one need a sarcasm tag? I don’t like using em but this joke is going to start zero fun conversations

    • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sarcasm acknowledged. If it were possible, what do you think the world would look like if inflation were 0% for a few decades? I hope this is a fun conversation. If not, I’ll settle for another joke, amusing anecdote or icy silence with a judgmental stare.

      • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        if inflation were 0% for a few decades

        “You obviously know nothing of how the real world works.”

        Was going to type a whole bullshit essay with random made up stats and facts to make your idle question look malicious and uninformed, but I just cant be arsed. Can we just pretend I was a cunt for mild chuckles?

          • tetris11@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            In their defence, they raised several valid points about the musical harmony between My Little Pony and eugenics that made my heart swell

        • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I got the same macroeconomics education as a lot of people. I get why 2% inflation is a common target. I do, however, like thought experiments using extreme values.

          I wouldn’t say it’s a particularly idle question by social media standards. Admittedly, that’s a pretty low bar. Perhaps I am uniformed. I’m definitely not being malicious.

          Can we just pretend I was a cunt for mild chuckles?

      • Eq0@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        The assumed reason for inflation, as I understand it, is that on one hand things devalue over time and on the other we build our system around infinite growth and rewarding innovation (many asterisks here…)

        During the Middle Ages, neither statements were considered true, the world was considered stagnant and there was virtually no inflation. That was before the banking system - so with 0% inflation i would expect the banks to collapse…

        And then… I don’t know! Stuff is hard and economics harder…

      • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        The world economies slow down probably.

        At negative inflation there is no incentive to spend your money because is becomes increasingly valuable the longer you hold it. With high inflation, there’s incentive to spend because the longer you keep your money in the mattress the less it’s worth to you.

        At zero it just is, but that’s less than the usual goal of a couple percent of inflation year over year.

        Or maybe I’m full of shit idk.

      • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’d enjoy the topic at a less busy time of life. I’m being kept tired, distracted, and poor lately as a systematic form of oppressive totalitarian rule - and that’s just from my kid!

      • LumpyPancakes@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Most cryptos are deflationary. That seems to cause hoarding.

        Having no inflation sounds good to me if paired with no growth in population, but I know little about economics.

      • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Wait. It’s possible to actually own a house? I thought only boomers were allowed to. I checked what mortgage I could get. I’m able to purchase a parking spot.

        And 2 homes max.

        Why would you need 2 houses?

        • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          A concession to vacation homes. So long as there are enough homes for everyone, I see little problem with it. Restoring the wilderness and everyone learning to camp would be better.

    • Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ok, you get a maximum of 1 sqr feet for that and no paying for a bigger flat.

    • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If only residential rents really were capped at $1, what do you think would happen? In this scenario, I’m assuming it’s limited to one per household. That is, a family or individual can’t rent multiples at $1, just the one.

      • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        The rental market immediately dries up as everyone with the ability to move into a rental place does so. Owners of apartments and rental houses immediately divest at the earliest possible time since properties are no longer lucrative. In the meantime, they fail to put any effort into the pretense of basic upkeep except whatever makes their rentals sellable.

        The market becomes immediately saturated with previous rental properties now available for individual sale and high supply lowers cost dramatically. The idea of sunk costs makes owners unlikely to sell at rock bottom prices so apartment complexes and the like go out of business, evict everyone and sell their copper from their air conditioners to modestly recuperate the last few months of expenses (water, electricity, leading office staff, etc) and burn them down for insurance money. Single family homes are donated for the use of younger relatives until the market recuperates enough to sell.

        It’s a wild ride for about $24 worth of months for all renters, then, ultimately, the price of housing comes down but renting is no longer a “thing”. Some renters can now afford to buy their own houses (Yahoo!) but without changing the pay structure of society, the most vulnerable of wage workers are now homeless (Crap).

        Or something, idk.

  • AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    The cost of all stuffed animals at a thrift shop.

    Then I could easily work on increasing the amount of rescues I will have. It’s currently 1.5 rescue to 4 others ( purchased at a store, gift shop, gift, etcetera ).

    My goal to someday have more rescues than store bought would be a little easier.

    Oh yeah, and kids would have an easier time accessing them because $1 stuffed animals are a lot easier to convince a parent to buy than a $5.99 stuffed animal. But I don’t like kids, so they were an afterthought!

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      How is this hypothetical child being raised? Are we talking Capri sun here or Tropicana. Do they get an iPad?