tal

Oh, another one. A stainless steel knife. Stainless steel apparently didn’t exist until the early 1800s.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stainless_steel

“The knife that does not rust.”

It sounds like we didn’t have aluminum until the early 1800s, either (and it was very expensive for a while, until we got processing with electricity), so very lightweight metal objects would be pretty remarkable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium

I’m not sure exactly what you mean.

If you’re asking what household item doesn’t actually change, but would be considered extraordinary by someone in a medieval setting, and function and be useful in that environment, I’d say matches.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Match

It sounds like China had a primitive chemical match well before Europe, but that it wasn’t until the early 1800s that Europe had the match in common production, so I’d guess that a European fantasy setting likely wouldn’t have matches.

Assuming that you’re just using their website, I’d guess a problem on their end.

That being said, could be something you’ve done that’s tripped it.

You could try reloading the webpage, see if that magically makes the issue go away.

Could disable all browser extensions, and try that.

Could try a simpler character and see if it shows up with even that. Don’t upload an image or use variables in descriptions or whatever it supports.

I’m not familiar with that website, but I understand that there are various formats in which characters may be exported. If it has the ability to do so and you’re trying to import a pre-created character card, could be something wrong with that character card.

Could report it to them if they have a route to take reported issues.

EDIT: They appear to have a support community on the Threadiverse, which you can find at !perchance@lemmy.world.

I’d also bet against the CMOS battery, if the pre-reboot logs were off by 10 days.

The CMOS battery is used to maintain the clock when the PC is powered off. But he has a discrepancy between current time and pre-reboot logs. He shouldn’t see that if the clock only got messed up during the power loss.

I’d think that the time was off by 10 days prior to power loss.

I don’t know why it’d be off by 10 days. I don’t know uptime of the system, but that seems like an implausible amount of drift for a PC RTC, from what I see online as lilely RTC drift.

It might be that somehow, the system was set up to use some other time source, and that was off.

It looks like chrony is using the Debian NTP pool at boot, though, and I donpt know why it’d change.

Can DHCP serve an NTP server, maybe?

kagis

This says that it can, and at least when the comment was written, 12 years ago, Linux used it.

https://superuser.com/questions/656695/which-clients-accept-dhcp-option-42-to-configure-their-ntp-servers

The ISC DHCP client (which is used in almost any Linux distribution) and its variants accept the NTP field. There isn’t another well known/universal client that accepts this value.

If I have to guess about why OSX nor Windows supports this option, I would say is due the various flaws that the base DHCP protocol has, like no Authentification Method, since mal intentioned DHCP servers could change your systems clocks, etc. Also, there aren’t lots of DHCP clients out there (I only know Windows and ISC-based clients), so that leave little (or no) options where to pick.

Maybe OS X allows you to install another DHCP client, Windows isn’t so easy, but you could be sure that Linux does.

My Debian trixie system has the ISC DHCP client installed in 2025, so might still be a factor. Maybe a consumer broadband router on your network was configured to tell the Proxmox box to use it as a NTP server or something? I mean, bit of a long shot, but nothing else that would change the NTP time source immediately comes to mind, unless you changed NTP config and didn’t restart chrony, and the power loss did it.

I don’t think that the grid frequency is used for PC timekeeping. You have internal timekeeping circuits. AC power stops at the PSU, and I don’t think that there’s any cable over which a time protocol flows from the PSU to the motherboard.

Not sure what you mean but IIRC, he dropped out to start Facebook.

kagis

Yup.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Zuckerberg

Harvard University (dropped out)

Incidentally, some other prominent tech founders did the same. Off the top of my head:

Bill Gates (founder, Microsoft):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Gates

Harvard University (dropped out)

Michael Dell (founder, Dell Technologies):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Dell

University of Texas at Austin (dropped out)

Steve Wozniak (founder, Apple):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Wozniak

University of Colorado Boulder (expelled)

He started Apple later, didn’t directly do it from college.

He did go back to university, years later, after he’d retired from Apple, and got his bachelor’s degree.

Yeah, in all honesty, it’s not really my ideal as a quote to capture the idea. Among other things, it’s comparing what is for the quoted person, household tasks and employment, whereas I’d generally prefer employment vs employment for most of these.

And for the quoted person, the issue is that AI is doing work that we tend to think of as potentially-desirable, rather than in the context I’m writing about, where it’s more that science fiction often portrays AI-driven sex robots that perform for humans (think Blade Runner or A.I. Artificial Intelligence (2001)), but doesn’t really examine humans performing for AIs.

Still, it was the closest popular quote I could think of to address the idea that the split between AI and human roles in a world with AIs is not that which we might have anticipated.

Fair enough. I will point out that for the context of my comment, this is probably functionally equivalent — that is, if one has a piece of software to walk the DHT and build a list of torrents on it, it’s probably still going to be done in a fully-automated fashion.

In the broad sense that understanding of spatial relationships and objects is just kind of limited in general with LLMs, sure, nature of the system.

If you mean that models simply don’t have a training corpus that incorporates adequate erotic literature, I suppose that it depends on what one is up to and the bar one has. No generative AI in 2025 is going to match a human author.

If you’re running locally, where many people use a relatively-short context size on systems with limited VRAM, I’d suggest a long context length for generating erotic literature involving bondage implements like chastity cages, as otherwise once information about the “on/off” status of the implement passes out of the context window, the LLM won’t have information about the state of the implement, which can lead to it generating text incompatible with that state. If you can’t afford the VRAM to do that, you might look into altering the story such that a character using such an item does not change state over the lifetime of the story, if that works for you. Or, whenever the status of the item changes, at appropriate points in the story, manually update its status in the system prompt/character info/world info/lorebook/whatever your frontend calls its system to inject static text into the context at each prompt.

My own feeling is that relative to current systems, there’s probably room for considerably more sophisticated frontend processing of objects, and storing state and injecting state about it efficiently into the system prompt. The text of a story is not an efficient representation of world state. Like, maybe use an LLM itself to summarize world state and then inject that summary into the context. Or, for specific games written to run atop an LLM, have some sort of Javascript module that runs in a sandbox, runs on each prompt and response to update its world state, and dynamically generates text to insert into the context.

I expect that game developers will sort a lot of this out and develop conventions, and my guess is that the LLM itself probably isn’t the limiting factor on this today, but rather how well we generate context text for it.

Even if they were wearing a mask, new, more-capable biometric analysis could often identify humans.

I have to say that the basic concept of having Meta pay human adult content performers to perform to teach an AI about sexual performance would be kind of surreal.

“So what do you do for work?”

“I’m an exotic dancer.”

“Straight or gay establishment?”

“Err…I perform for an artificial intelligence.”

You know what the biggest problem with pushing all-things-AI is? Wrong direction. I want AI to do my laundry and dishes so that I can do art and writing, not for AI to do my art and writing so that I can do my laundry and dishes.

— Joanna Maciejewaska

I expect that Joanna would not be enthused about humans stripping for machines.

I’d have some questions about the structural integrity of that dryer.

billion dollar corporations

https://companiesmarketcap.com/meta-platforms/marketcap/

Market capitalization of Meta Platforms (Facebook) (META)

Market cap: $1.955 Trillion USD

So in the technical sense that they’re worth more than a billion dollars, yes, but…

I suspect that if employees at Meta who are tasked with hoovering up training data from everywhere they can find are just watching porn, it probably won’t go over well on their annual reviews.

I would give good odds that the human at Meta most-closely responsible for the BitTorrent download at issue probably has never even seen this particular torrent by name or URL. The scope of data involved in training is too large for direct human involvement. They probably did something along the lines of writing a bot in Python or similar to spider websites and feed every torrent it could find into a torrent downloader. That downloader’s output then gets dumped into some massive internal collection of data that gets used by some other team as part of the training process. The humans just create tools and set them in motion, never actually see the overwhelming majority of the data that they’re processing.

I think that the broader concept of instilling desired ethics into an AI is part of the friendly AI problem, which is very real and serious — and possibly not reasonably solvable. So while I don’t really think that Cortana 2045 running around raping humans or something like that is very high on my likely risk list, I think that the broader problem that contains that particular issue probably is something that we’ll need to deal with.

The very first artificial general intelligence humanity created was born with an extensive understanding of breast jiggle.

My bet is that personal flying vehicles will happen and gradually spread — probably not as a mass replacement for ground-based vehicles — but it’ll be fully-autonomous vehicles. It won’t be Average Joe becoming a pilot.

EDIT: Well, okay, I mean, you can get personal flying vehicles today — in the US, you don’t need a license or anything to fly something like this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powered_parachute

…whereas you do to operate a car on public roads. Just not allowed to fly over built-up areas. But I’m talking about heavier vehicles.

I haven’t blocked anyone on this account, but it’s new.

On my last one, I think I blocked three users. I believe all were basically trying to flood a community so that it was unreadable (one, IIRC, was just posting the same large Simpsons or Futurama image repeatedly throughout a thread to try to stop people from talking).

While I’d personally rather have more users over here producing comments and posts and such, I’d point out that unless something has changed, you can browse Reddit without an account or logging in, from a Web browser. You just can’t post, comment or vote.

Specifically for subreddits flagged as NSFW, Reddit’s “new” Web UI will demand that mobile users install their app, but you can bypass that by using the “old” Web UI.

goes to check to see if that still works

Huh. Actually, there is a change, but not the way I’d expected. It looks like at least where I am, California, now even the new Reddit Web UI lets anonymous users into NSFW subreddits using a mobile web browser, just by clicking on an “I declare that I am 18+” button. That definitely had not been the case. Maybe these countries declaring age restriction laws basically made them review their policy, and some of the changes have actually made it more-permissive, based on geolocation of IP.

e.g.

https://reddit.com/r/nsfwcyoa

https://old.reddit.com/r/nsfwcyoa

Now both are accessible. I will bet that that’s not what people in the UK see, though (well, not unless they’re on some sort of VPN with an exit node in a place with different laws).

Just an occasion glance every like 15 minutes…like a little drip

“Not like those people with a check-every-three-minutes habit that are fiends for the stuff.” :-)