

Wow, das macht traurig und wütend. Und ein Vierteljahrhundert später ist es scheinbar unverändert.
Wow, das macht traurig und wütend. Und ein Vierteljahrhundert später ist es scheinbar unverändert.
Not a state, but there was Munich’s LiMux.
How interesting! Does this apply to alcohol/other “recreational” drugs too, then, or only sedative ones?
To be honest, I think I prefer the Emacs one due to how absurd it is: https://youtu.be/urcL86UpqZc
But all of them are hilarious.
- Traffic
- Remote (app) features
- Music
protein folding
We’re at the point where, due to how b2c tech services work, I think a lot of people think AI === LLM
I’d rather take a compile step than having no type safety in JS, even as a user.
Damn. Thanks for the link!
Wenn’s denn fair bezahlt würde, joa…
Ooh, you’re totally right!! I forgot about that since it’s not in the older versions.
set -euo pipefail
Fun fact, if you’re forced to write against POSIX shell, you aren’t allowed to use these options, since they’re not a thing, which is (part of) the reason why for example Google doesn’t allow any shell language but bash, lol.
Then you’ll have to find the time later when this leads to bugs. If you write against bash while declaring it POSIX shell, but then a random system’s sh
doesn’t implement a certain thing, you’ll be SOL. Or what exactly do you mean by “match standards”?
Well yeah, with CSS and user interaction it’s understandable… as I’ve linked above.
The question was if this is possible for purely-HTML markup descriptions without CSS nor clicks, and it was a rhetorical one.
Zum Glück ging es im Kanzlerkandidaten-TV-Duell 30 von 90 Minuten um Migration (und 15 Sekunden um bezahlbares Wohnen).
So where in that can I encode an arbitrary program? Like one could do in JavaScript?
Who is “it” which interprets things? Is it part of HTML/CSS?
Boy have we got the API for you!
Replace all spaces with the unicode non-breaking space that looks the same.
Although I know at least some language servers will detect this and mark it as an error, lol.
Good and true point, but arguably most NASs are built to be used, not to be not-used…