• 6 Posts
  • 11 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle


    • Terrible format for archiving knowledge
    • Terrible tool for retrieving knowledge
    • Locks community access behind a corporate license agreement
    • Hands control of community-created content to a corporation
    • Prevents indexing by web search engines
    • Antithetical to interoperability
    • Privacy-hostile

    A web forum is far better in most cases. If you can’t manage to run your own, there are plenty of lemmy servers that will do it for you. Even an email list (with searchable archives) would be better than Discord.

    If you have collaborative documents that outgrow the forum format, use a wiki.

    If real-time chat is needed, irc or matrix.

    A project hosting its community on Discord is a project that won’t get my contributions.


  • disallow list of known bad email providers.

    Imagine giving someone your phone number, and having them say you have to get a different one because they don’t like some of the digits in it.

    I have seen this nonsense more times than I care to remember. Please don’t build systems this way.

    If you’re trying to do bot detection or the like, use a different approach. Blacklisting email addresses based on domain or any other pattern does a poor job of it and creates an awful user experience.

    (And if it prevents people from using spam-fighting tools like forwarding services, then it’s directly user-hostile, and makes the world a worse place.)


  • By the way, please don’t write regex to try to validate email addresses. Seriously.

    Amen.

    There are libraries for that; some of them are even good.

    Spoiler alert: Few of them are good, and those few are so simple that you might as well not use a library.

    The only way to correctly validate an email address is to send a message to it, and verify that it arrived.













  • https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/24/407

    Date	Mon, 24 Nov 2014 07:42:06 -0700
    From	Jonathan Corbet <>
    Subject	Re: [PATCH] Documentation: fix formatting to make 's' happy
    
    On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 09:54:17 +0200 (EET)
    Tero Roponen  wrote:
    
    > From: Maisa Roponen 
    > 
    > "That letter [the last s] is sad because all the others
    > have those things [=] below them and it does not."
    > 
    > This patch fixes the tragedy so all the letters can
    > be happy again.
    > 
    > Signed-off-by: Maisa Roponen 
    > [The author being 4 years old needed some assistance]
    > Signed-off-by: Tero Roponen 
    > ---
    > When I was reading the documentation, my 4-year-old
    > niece wanted to see what I was doing. After telling her,
    > she noticed that something was very wrong and asked
    > me to fix it. Instead, I helped her fix it herself.
    
    Please inform your niece that the patch has been applied and that the
    lonely "s" need pine away no longer.
    
    Thanks,
    
    jon