

Wonder what they used for the JS state since it’s dependent on the runtime.
Wonder what they used for the JS state since it’s dependent on the runtime.
YEAR OF THE LINUX DESKTOP
It’s the other way around. Windows will stop supporting kernel level anti-cheat because of Crowdstrike
I use terminal commands to open relevant ide for the project
Having a bunch of plugins built-in means also supported in updates and play nice with each other
How closely do you need to model a thought before it becomes the real thing?
It’s because a lot of the way humans go about their life is based on traditions. Getting everybody to switch from a system that already works pretty well is just a hassle.
Examples:
I also had issue when I was working on a pycharm project back when I was on windows. During setup it asked me “What’s your name?” and my name has a cheeky accent which Windows was decided should be the name of my Home folder. Home folder also has appdata and whatnon so which the build system didn’t expect to have a an accent in the folder path.
I ended up having to create a different folder and link to it then move all the path configurations to that folder link just so I could get imports working.
I use Jetbrains IDEs now for 5 years, I’ve used VSCode, Sublime, Atom, Vim, Neovim but I feel like Jetbrains IDEs are just better if you have the RAM to run it.
So it’s not all bad, but comes with a lot of good such as “invert if statement”, “use template strings” and “extract method” thingies along with a load of plugins.
It’s a common practice but not required. Python behaves like JS where it just runs whatever you wrote. If you don’t want it to run when importing the file you can put the main() inside the if so it only runs when you run the actual file.
You can use it when developing a function or a class to run a simple test without running the whole program.
Bash combines quick, dirty and fast in exchange for readable. Bash is also nice for terminal functions like opening a set of programs and whatever
Don’t get me wrong, I still write more than 98% of code by hand and of course, I can write those functions myself in 30m myself but I can get it in 60s with the AI. LLMs can write code to that does parse - > model - > map - > format with only one or two easy to fix bugs.
It’s in the very niche cases where it’s just tedious to write something out that LLMs actually work. “Write an API client that uses [library] that handles these requests/responses” comes also to mind as something that would work.
I’m using now also to learn react native where I get bugs I’m very unfamiliar with and SO doesn’t give me a good answer.
I’ve also had decent success at having it review my code with “how would I further optimise this code” and it gives me some pointers and then writes buggy code but the approach is correct usually and I can implement it myself.
These AIs really suck at writing correct code but I’ve had good success in having them write code generators. I recently made it write a script that takes a SQL create table statement and converts in to TS and gives insert update, delete and whatnot and also creates a simple class that handles the operations.
I had to write the original code by hand but having it write code that writes boilerplate which I correct is pretty good.
Other code is hit or miss IMO
But fuck Hitler’s mom just to be safe
That’s a nice explanation, I’m ASD and wife is ADHD and it makes sense in our case. I just used my son as an excuse for underperforming at work because instead of programming whatever I was programming a different thing.
No ADHD, just autism here. When finishing I get a small relief and no accomplishment, just emptiness if anything. I have to revisit a job well done 6mo later to get the feeling of accomplishment for a job well done.
It’s not, Vim is GNU. I listed some of them as “I use open source and proprietary” things. Jellyfin is open source also.
It’s a trick question, they’re all bad.
(I have autism)
Now we just need a language with flames in the logq