Google thanks you for your data.

at a local shop

I’ve never even heard of Halti, let alone seen one in a store.

Around these parts, if you want a blank running shoe, you pay $20 at the local superstore then $200 at the doctor’s office, a few times a year each.

brb, gonna run a marathon in a pair of Oxfords

Sure, but good luck finding a decent quality running shoe without conspicuous branding at a local shop though.

Can’t wear it, if they don’t make it.

What do you mean where? It’s literally in the name.

The article literally includes marketing material for the restaurant chain and is dripping with political allusions.

The subject of the article is 39, a redditor, disagrees with his wife on how to raise their kids, thinks everything must be transactional, and that only the “worthy” deserve “treats”. The guy is literally a caricature of Fox’s audience and right wing ideology as a whole.

So, no. It’s not just a silly article. It’s still thoroughly infused with the same propaganda, and now we’ve been duped into spreading it as something innocent.

We left Reddit for Lemmy just so we could post Reddit stories that appear on Fox News, on Lemmy.

Wow. Good job, folks.

Believe it or not, some people are capable of acknowledging more than one news story per week.

Or instead, form a union and demand better pay and retention incentives.

I’m sorry, but there is no situation where it is permissible to stand idle as someone suffers an untimely and preventable death.

Even soldiers at war, captured in foreign territory without visas, are entitled to lifesaving care.

OK. So by that logic, let’s say you are touring Europe and have a heart attack. The paramedics are in the area and available, but refuse to take you to the hospital. You are left to die on the street.

You think you deserve such foul treatment?

When a government is informed that people are dying within its waters, and the gov has the capability to respond but deliberately chooses not to because the victims are “african”, you think that the government bears no responsibity for their deaths?

Is it really so different though? The outcome of both situations is the same. Migrants are dying, through direct action and deliberate inaction.

Mediterranean nations have the opportunity to protect lives, but instead they choose kill / let migrants die.

You are defending willful negligence that leads to the deaths of migrants.

Up to 1 in 13 migrants die in the Mediterranean. Italy as well as Greece have been allowing migrants to die as a part of deterrence-based migration policy. Rescuing the passengers of capsized migrant vessels has been criminalized. There are plenty of articles that confirm these facts. Here is one example.

Bill Gates (and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation), and some within the Biden administration have vocally opposed waiving IP rights on the Covid-19 vaccines

Additional article

Say there is a car with no human driver, that is being sold as requiring “no human input other than set destination, stop, and go”.

If that vehicle crashes, you think the person who bought the car (the passenger) has legal liability, and not the manufacturer?

That’s like being a passenger on a bus and getting sued if the bus driver hits a parked car.

Are we talking truly autonomous vehicles with no driver, or today’s “self-driving-but-keep-your-hands-on-the-wheel” type cars?

In the case of the former, it should be absolutely the fault of the manufacturer.

I may be being pedantic, but I wouldn’t call a 1 vs 376 situation an “even playing field”.

https://www.businessinsider.com/376-officers-were-at-uvalde-elementary-school-over-hour-report-2022-7?op=1

Human life is to be protected, rescued etc. in all cases.

Exceptions need to have very clear and very strict rules

Bruh.