

Glad I could help! This command is just so much nicer.
VGhlcmUgaXMgbm8gZ2VudWluZSBpbnRlbGxpZ2VuY2UgLCB0aGVyZSBpcyBhcnRpZmljaWFsIHN0dXBpZGl0eS4NClRoZXJlIGlzIG5vIHNlcmVuaXR5LCB0aGVyZSBpcyBhbnhpZXR5Lg0KVGhlcmUgaXMgbm8gcGVhY2UsIHRoZXJlIGlzIHR1cm1vaWwuDQpUaGVyZSBpcyBubyBzdHJ1Y3R1cmUsIHRoZXJlIGlzIHBvcnJpZGdlLg0KVGhlcmUgaXMgbm8gb3JkZXIsIHRoZXJlIGlzIGNoYW9zLg==
Glad I could help! This command is just so much nicer.
Now you know why it’s called the Disk Destroyer.
Before using dd, I prefer to run lsblk first so that I can see what each disk is called. Before pressing enter, I also double check the names with the lsblk output.
I was just thinking about that post.
What a legend. So, it’s technically possible, but not recommended.
Switched from Fedora to Debian. Here are my reasons:
😂 This is exactly the sort of madness I came here for.
What doesn’t kill you, cripple you for life or leave mental scars, might make you stronger. Chances are, it will make you weaker.
Good catch. I screwed up the zeros. Fixed it now.
deleted by creator
Is that elemental silver or some fancy compound?
Take a really long rope and put one end on either pole of the Earth, and the other end on the equator. Use the shortest path, and make sure the rope is tight. No squiggles allowed! Chop that rope into exactly 10 000 000 equal parts. One of them is as long as a meter. Now you just need to find the right one.
Edit: more zeros.
Food science is truly complex, so in order to accurately replicate a recipe, you need to standardize pretty much everything. Currently, there’s plenty of variation and you just compensate by winging it and keeping an eye on the pot a little longer.
In order to reduce variation, we need to standardize the following:
All materials and methods should be accurately documented, because things like the coating or weight of your pan can introduce unwanted variability.
True, but square and cubic units are inconvenient due to the way prefixes work. Use liters to solve that problem.
Thanks for the in-depth explanation.
The way I see it, MWI is more of a philosophical idea. As far as I know, it’s impossible to test it, so currently it’s still firmly outside the sphere of science.
You pointed out some valid reasons why the future of MWI looks shaky, and I’m fine with that. If MWI falls apart, I’ll just move on to the next best thing. I just find MWI intuitively appealing, but I don’t have any strong reasons to believe it or reject it. As you mentioned, MWI doesn’t change the way you would carry out quantum mechanics, so currently it has no practical impact.
Bring some ice cream too. Those kids will never be the same after that.
Exactly! That’s the sort of time travel I’m talking about!
Next stop: 1095, the office of Alexios I Komnenos. Who wants to see what the world looks like without the crusades?
I’ll visit past me and leave some letters that contain useful information. You know, don’t trust those people, avoid doing this mistake, know yourself etc. would be interesting to see how that timeline diverges from my own.
Actually. now that I’ve opened this door, might as well try influencing world history on a larger scale. How about I visit certain key moments where a dangerous person almost died, but survived to cause massive harm later down the line. Would be really interesting to see how history plays out after nudging Hitler a little bit closer than to that suitcase. History is just full of special moments like that.
I wouldn’t be a passive observer. I would actively change things to see what happens.
BTW, I believe in the many words interpretation of quantum physics, so all possibilities are equally real and they all exist simultaneously. No matter how hard you try to fix things or how badly you mess things up, that disaster branch was already there, always will be.
It’s always in relation to what the speaker considers average in that situation.
If someone at home is good at cooking, they could make nice meals out of fish while everyone else in that group can just make porridge. If someone at work is good at autocad, they can make technical drawings while everyone else can just barely read them.
Using seconds as the base unit of time would work in various situations, but not all. For example, kiloseconds (ks) would be handy for measuring the runtime of a movie or the length of a workday. In that regard, it’s just a matter of getting used to it. However the length of a solar day is about 86.4 ks and a year is about 31.54 Ms, which would be annoying numbers to memorize. Then again, remembering numbers like 60, 24, 52, 365 is about as annoying too, so that’s a problem for another day.
Thanks. I’ll keep an eye on that later today.