

Hugely
Hugely
I have “Lemmy” tattooed across my elbow
I don’t necessarily believe it’s in good faith. Just pointing out that it could be a simple misunderstanding and added back.
They can quietly drop or add anything internally, or just be inconsistent. They don’t even have to have a public policy. So the words don’t mean much to begin with. Once there are examples of no enforcement is when it becomes a serious issue.
A YouTube spokesperson said that the removal of “gender identity and expression” from the hate speech policy was part of regular copy edits to the website, and that the enforcement of the policy hasn’t changed. Hate speech toward someone over their “sex, gender, or sexual orientation” is still barred, however critics say that “gender” is very different than “gender identity and expression.”
If this is a good faith statement it’s a non-issue IMO
Good reminder of this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0YW7x9U5TQ
I think the situation will improve as people migrate there and more normal videos get uploaded
I’ve seen that argument for Odysee as far back as 5 years ago. I don’t think it’s going to occur. Same goes for Truth Social
Ukraine losing would be terrible for Trump. It makes him look weak and bad at foreign policy. Everyone knows that Russia invaded Ukraine unprovoked, and they’ll do it again
For electronics try Swappa or Jawa
China is pro-Palestinian, so it’s still directly related
I have tracked them down: https://joesdaily.com/food-drink/hellofresh-spice-blends-how-to-make-them/
The trick is to use a search engine. In my case, I used DuckDuckGo
I used to use it but on a technical level it was consistently disappointing. There are a number of creators who have joined then subsequently left Nebula, often on bad terms. I expect that to continue to be the case, so I don’t have a lot of faith in its sustainability personally. Pursuing classes and exclusive content seems misguided in the long-term.
If didn’t work on it, someone else would.
I’m not trying to critique or judge you, but I think it’s worth pointing out this is a logical fallacy.
Most people don’t love that movie though. It’s an experimental movie based on a specific fear
Genuine question: If he didn’t know about the suit and was actually a hermit with no communication with family, could someone actually hide their way out of something like this?
For reference, the text is coming from the <title>
tag in the HTML, which can differ from the displayed title at the opt of the article. It’s likely different for SEO/clickthrough purposes
Not sure what “Authenticator Pro” is but your link goes to “Stratum - Authenticator App” fyi
I guess it depends on how the word is used. I think of obsession as strictly a personal thing, and almost everyone I know wants 0 or 1 car because it’s difficult to get around without it. I’d consider that practical instead on excessive. Though I guess you could argue wanting your one car to be bigger or more expensive is excessive
Don’t get me wrong, the culture definitely favors cars over pedestrians. I just don’t think I’d use the word obsessive to represent that relationship
Edit: spelling
That’s a pretty ridiculous headline imo
Most of those should be replacement with robotics
It was a sub-brand of Lego. Saved them from going under actually. Then discontinued and later rebooted (with different designs and parts) and rediscontinuted.
Here’s a good doc on the subject: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=126bLUkHuNI