Eh, the author definitely has more responsibility than he makes out. He’s fully aware that it wasn’t suitable as a backup for all of his stuff (like the book he was writing and all the tutorials), but acts like that shouldn’t matter because he wanted to use it that way to make his desktop workflow better.
It isn’t about protecting children. It’s about exploiting adults.
A majority of people, both children and adults, will successfully be exploited by this. Even if it is eventually repealed (which is unlikely, there are businesses set up dependent on this - we can’t deny investors their profits!), it’s already happening now.
Pretty sure it needs a live camera to access. It’s less a photo and more a video.
It looks daft now with a little hindsight, but we’re kind of still in the foresight stage for the overall life of IPv6.