To explain

There are 2 Error struct / enum declarations, probably in separate files

To the ?, they are different types and cannot be converted from one to the other (because they are two disparate structs that happen to have the same name, but can have different bodies)

To fix this

You can either use .some_func_result().map_err(|err| /* conversion here/*)?; +

Or you can impl From<Error1> for Error2

And you should also name it ThingError, so you can visually differentiate the two

+ There are like 10 different mapping functions, depending on if you’re using an option or a result

I never remember which one specifically i need, (unwrap_or, map_or, map_or_else, ok, ok_or)

I usually just hunt through the auto complete list until i find the function signature that gives me what i need

The SoC on the motherboard has a special EDL mode

This is kinda like the SoC’s pre-bootloader, which loads the bootloader and can be used to flash a new bootloader

EDL mode is locked behind vendor specific certs/keys, so it’s unaccessible to the device owner

Quality work will always need human craftsmanship

I’d wager that most revolutionary technologies are either those that expand human knowledge and understanding, and (to a lesser extent) those that increase replicability (like assembly lines)

Sometimes you forget to verify if your assumptions are true

I just have a spell checker enabled in vscode

So helpful for dynamic languages that can’t detect undeclared variables (looking at you JS)

I was reading Crafting Interpreters. After adding function calls and stack frames, i tested my implementation with the Fibonacci script at the end of the chapter

I spent about 2 hours debugging my call stack, and even tested the script in Python

Only to realize that Fib(3) is indeed 2

I’m not sure that’s their intended design. Old pull-tab cans actually had a ring for you to pull them off (similar to “easy open” soup cans of today)

I’d imagine that as the tab shrunk and changed from pull to a lever action, the “ring” was left as a vestigial design (as a form of skeuomorphism)

That’s the only reason i don’t think this is real

This is genius

Hardback is always worth the price

If you do that, you lose formatting and comments every time you load the source from disk

As much as this hurts, yeet; as an alias throw; is hilarious

Sanity checks

Always, always check if your assumptions are true

• am i even running the function?
• is this value what i think it is?
• what is responsible for loading this data, and does it work as expected?
• am i pointed at the right database?
• is my configuration set and loaded in correctly?

I mean, you just need to look at the conflicting files, fix up the code, then stage those changes and pop a new commit

There’s no “special” merge conflict resolution commit “type”

As for fixing the code itself, I usually look at what changed between both versions, and then re-author the code such that both changes make “sense”

Only eggs can sustain me

I’ve started collecting ideas in my notes

I open Obsidian, create a new note, and jot down the idea

Obsidian is preconfigured to add new notes to an Inbox folder, and the note’s name defaults to the date and time

At a later time, I go through my inbox and rename and recategorize

This makes writing down ideas painless, while also minimizing the interruption of whatever I was doing at the time

Speaking as the “never wore winter clothes” kid, when you’re overweight, you can tolerate colder weather due to body fat being a natural insulator

Combine that with a natural tolerance for cold, and sensory issues with heavy clothes, and you get this.

To the point where I had many fights with my parents over it

(I still wear sandals year round because fuck shoes)

Pro Tip: put the sheet on opposite corners first. Bottom left corner, then top right corner

This keeps tension on the sheet and prevents it from slipping off while you’re finishing the other 2 corners

I’m more talking about theory than practical.

I’ve not developed anything in C/C++, so I don’t know practical uses for a double pointer, aside from multidimensional arrays, or arrays of pointers

My point was that, conceptually, pointers to pointers is how most complex data structures work. Even if the C representation of said code doesn’t have a int** somewhere

Mostly boys admiring the boobs or butts of girls

Them: “Yo man, check out her ass… She’s so hot”

How i want to reply: “Yep, that’s a gluteus maximus, although I don’t see her sweating”