Same that’s why we organised between the students. Lecturers weren’t handing this out

The right wing factions pretty much say they’ve been guaranteed as much.

Was very common in my uni. We had our full degree on mega so could read ahead.

Op needs to infiltrate the Oxford student fb group

People have lost their minds because of a recommender algorithm and echo chambers. Ai agents are going to tear us to shreds.

Nope just multiple streams of unsymbolic thinking usually. When thinking of something specific or planning how to say something I’ll consciously subvocalise, but there’s no volume/pitch/tone. Having your subconscious talk to you all day sounds exhausting.

Jesus Christ mate do you realise how daft you sound.

No, it’s not what Lindell had. Again you’re demonstrating your complete lack of a grasp on reality.

The private password is on GitHub in plain text.

Where do you think he’s running in his dreams.

Aphantasia here. Can’t see or remember shit. It sucks.

Only benefits are speed reading and a boost to abstract/scientific thinking. But episodic memories and visualisation sound more fun.

Also resistant to everything. Connective tissue disorder? (EDS)?

It’s discrepancies in the data with the means to do it clearly evidenced what are you on about.

Remote access code + the private admin password + the code to flip the votes and analysis by several different orgs and data scientists that show it looks like said code and smoothing were executed. As well as all the additional evidence in my OP of recorded breaches and tampering.

Now lets look at what the MAGAts have managed to string together in four years

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskConservatives/s/IyGqTgFxHZ

It’s a public piece of code with the admin password for the dominion machines that aligns with the discrepancies in the data.

The admin password was not public when the commit was pushed.

You’ll need to read the rest for yourself I’m afraid.

They even have the publicy pushed smoothing algorithm that was used to make it less obvious

https://old.reddit.com/r/somethingiswrong2024/comments/1hzr7io/serbia_series_part_1_technical_overview/

No they didn’t lol. Quote the evidence they presented to illustrate how daft it is in comparison. They failed at basic addition among a plethora of other equally hilariously incoherent shite.

That poll just shows a third of people who flipped from dem had it as their top issue. it doesn’t prove that’s why she lost the election even without considering the fraud.

That isn’t what evidence means. It absolutely is evidence.

The data is open, so is the analysis. If you read the bottom more is on the way and they’re seeking legal action to verify

https://electiontruthalliance.org/next-steps

If you’d look at it properly you’d see there are many things that wouldn’t occur by chance regardless of how unpopular she was.

If you can’t tell the difference between the nonsense Trump pushed out and this it sounds like you have a loose grip on objective reality. His points were incoherent and he got laughed out of court by judges he appointed. It wasn’t taken seriously because it was a joke.

Notably, these patterns in the voting data were also present in 2020 data, but less stark, and starting at 600 votes minimum. That is why Trump is so angry about 2020, and why he is convinced the dems cheated. He is angry because the country hated him so fucking much that they actually out voted a literal vote shifting algorithm.

Also I’m not a lib, and it was completely eviden they were attempting to steal the election the whole time through other means. (Changing laws, removing poll booths strategically in POC areas, gerrymandering, purging voter rolls, etc).

He also can’t keep his mouth shut about anything and just admits to shit unprompted - which we’ve also seen.

what?

Check again now their analysis and methodology has been released

https://smartelections.substack.com/p/so-clean

Social Media and Political Influence

Whistleblower Alleges AI-Driven Election Interference

• A former X (formerly Twitter) employee anonymously shared allegations on Substack claiming the platform was intentionally manipulated during the 2024 U.S. presidential election.

• According to the whistleblower, X’s algorithms were adjusted under Elon Musk’s leadership to prioritize pro-Trump and right-wing content. Some left-wing posts critical of Democrats were also boosted, but allegedly only to create a façade of balance.

  • Backed Up by Research: These claims align with findings from a recent study that audited X’s algorithm. Key findings include:
    • Right-leaning users experienced the most significant exposure bias, with the algorithm amplifying content aligned with their views.
    • Both left- and right-leaning users saw reduced exposure to opposing viewpoints, reinforcing echo chambers.
    • New accounts were reportedly subject to a distinct right-wing bias in their default timelines.
  • While the whistleblower’s claims remain speculative, these independent findings suggest that X’s algorithm did, in fact, favor certain political narratives.

• AI-Generated Propaganda: The whistleblower alleges that thousands of fake accounts were created using advanced AI systems, Grok and Eliza, to disseminate political messaging. These accounts were designed to imitate real users and reportedly pushed targeted propaganda related to Trump’s economic claims, border policies, and cryptocurrency initiatives.

• To support these claims, the whistleblower pointed to a breadcrumb in the Eliza documentation, which describes how AI profiles could be pre-configured with specific narratives and responses. One example, allegedly labeled “Trump,” was programmed to amplify campaign messaging.

Marc Andreessen’s Connection to Eliza AI

• Marc Andreessen, co-founder of Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), is closely connected to Eliza AI. His firm has backed Eliza Labs, the company behind the AI framework, which is also reportedly used internally at a16z (source).
• While it’s possible that the example in the Eliza public documentation in this context was coincidental or even intended as satire, the fact that Andreessen is backing technology capable of such manipulation raises serious concerns. It demonstrates how tools designed for decision-making and automation can easily be repurposed for political influence.

Andreessen’s Political Views

• Andreessen is an open supporter of MAGA politics and an advocate of Curtis Yarvin’s “Dark Enlightenment” philosophy, which proposes replacing democracy with a CEO-led “monarchy.”
  • Yarvin recently wrote an article suggesting that “American democracy should be replaced by what he calls a ‘monarchy’ run by a ‘C.E.O.’”
• As The Verge summarized:
  • “We are looking at a simple trade against personal liberty — abortion, the rights of gay and trans people, and possibly democracy itself — in favor of crypto, AI, and a tax policy they like better.”

Elon Musk’s Role

• The whistleblower also alleges that Musk was directly involved in these manipulations, reportedly overseeing algorithm changes and content moderation. Musk allegedly joked about being “Black Hat MAGA” while making these decisions.
• The claims further suggest that X allowed foreign influence campaigns from countries like Israel, Iran, and Russia to operate on the platform, as long as their goals aligned with the platform’s manipulated narrative.

Impact and Speculation

• The whistleblower describes the damage caused by these actions as catastrophic:
  • “The damage we’ve done is immeasurable, and I don’t know if it can ever be fixed. People don’t know what’s real anymore, and that’s exactly what we wanted.”
• While the full extent of these claims has yet to be proven, the whistleblower’s account is bolstered by independent research and the connections of influential figures like Andreessen and Musk. Together, they paint a troubling picture of how powerful technology may have been used to undermine democratic processes.

Voting System Interference

Evidence of Election Hacking

• Stephen Spoonamore, a cybersecurity expert, issued a “Duty to Warn” letter to Vice President Kamala Harris, outlining evidence of vote manipulation in key swing states during the 2024 U.S. presidential election.

• Working with Smart Elections, Spoonamore revealed that voting tabulators were allegedly programmed to alter results after processing 400 ballots (up from 600 in 2020), a tactic designed to evade detection during recounts.

• This tampering reportedly influenced outcomes in critical states, supported by findings in an analysis of Clark County’s election results.

• Additional irregularities included the use of “bullet ballots,” where votes were cast only for the presidential race. These disproportionately favored Trump and deviated significantly from historical norms, suggesting deliberate interference.

Trump’s Statements on Manipulation

• Donald Trump’s public remarks have fueled speculation that he was aware of these activities:
  • “We don’t need the votes,” he said, implying confidence in securing victory through means outside traditional voter turnout.
  • At a rally, he remarked, “Elon was very effective. He knows those computers better than anybody. Those vote counting computers. And we ended up winning Pennsylvania like in a landslide,” suggesting possible technological manipulation in vote counting.
  • His statement, “You won’t have to vote anymore,” further hinted at confidence in a pre-arranged outcome.

“It is thanks to you that the future of civilization is assured.”

No.

The only way his autism is related is if he overestimated how funny it would be. But he 100% meant to do a Nazi salute. Twice, and then repeated a dog whistle to the 14-words.

Yes but it’s still there when I reintroduce some rational. I can see the anger emerge as I get closer to hitting their internal contradictions. Mike Pence and his words on what happened on Jan6 is an easy shortcut to constitution-loving patriots who didn’t have an issue with the coup.