ill tell you this, the amount of data would require for anyone accept a statement or idea as fact is related to their emotional assessment of the idea. See it all the time with trump supporters that think that trump is actually fighting to cut tax on overtime pay simple because he said it on the trail and there no evidence (and they have no evidence) that is happening, on the other hand it would take an infinite amount of evidence that trump took bribes even as he openly appointed Elon after spending millions of dollars.

so its weird that you have to propagandize the facts just to get people anywhere near a reasonable level of skeptism.

but for me I just say anything is valid unless I know how its wrong, which is limbo of acceptance then afterwards it can become a scoreboard where for and against. maybe a source doesn’t 100% line up with a statement, hell even video/audio evidence can be incongruent with a statement (as in its similar to what’s said but doesn’t back up a statement). I think the claim that Floyd overdosed but the video doesn’t show a overdose from opioids, so you’d have to rule out overdose simple because video doesn’t match the description of an overdose.

it wouldn’t take much, generally new information has to be consistent with what I know. the hard part is understanding the new information. no one is randomly disprove gravity or that things have mass, but someone can prove to me how a myth is meant to be interpreted for the intended audience

This could be nice or a mild nuisance but I left a bag of edibles on the beach for someone to find. Did it to make quiting edible easier

nice, its funny that answer the question directly. i like the guy that said i have hidden childhood trauma

Spend hours trying educated them democracy and war and watch them break into faction to murder each other

lol just say they’re wrong and platform your own position

Yeah I was thinking you painted the bucket with tar venta black and really get sun to boil water. Other option is collecting vapor but that could be space inefficient

true, i guess i was thinking salt water distillation, so maybe contamination would okay. but I asked ai and since it would only be water vapor and that pressure would be temperature dependent then at room temp the would be 0.03 atm so there’s nothing in the vapor part. (at 100 C it would be 1 atm is okay)

there is benefit to putting a still in a vacuum because it will absorb thermal energy and lowering boiling point save energy

You could lower the bucket to boil the seal container.

I do have trouble imagining two containers with two different pressures but I get you can have a pressure valve like in a refrigeration system.

The pressure on the seal container would seem to be the same pressure as the phase changes. The container in the video was crushed by the atmosphere so that implies the pressure is lower than atmosphere post phase change.

But there seems be an issue once the water has became vapor like would the boiling point move enough so that the water would condensate and would condensation reduce the pressure thus lowering the pressure and boiling point.

There would be water in both the containers and tube. Seems strange that water in the tube at the vapor/liquid barrier would evaporator then condense in what’s essential a similar environment. Its possible when I think about it just the seal container water can evaporate and go back into the tube

I can’t really do calculations because I don’t know the process yet, but I think boiling water would be more energy than lifting water 34 feet since water heat capacity is so high.

Right now I do think the flaw would be it being a slow process or even inefficient

I decided to make an account on libretechni it’s federated and it has no down votes just want to see how that works out

I use microwave for a lot of things. Also the rep would bring me back to the microwave

I like the idea of an instance not having down votes that way. I assume that you could go to another instance and participate and no one could down vote you

Yeah I can definitely say Lemmy can get toxic. I thought with Redding your karma was a status symbol and indicated to other redditors on how to treat you or even if they wanted to engage with you. Along with you account age

It’s like you had to post animal pics for a week before you got any recognition.

Here people look at your post or comment likes and decide how to engage with you. There’s definitely approval addicts

I was never on those subs. I use Linux to wipe laptops I sell and I used for projects, I feel if I joined the sub then the posts would go over my head.

I’m pretty sure I left before the API fiasco. All I thought at the time is that corporations copy each other. Elon apparently had an effect on reddit

If I’m gonna get into politics it’s most likely to start organizational groups for approval voting/ranked Choice voting. I’ll tell people that they have to deal with entire spectrum

Lol I can see it’s controversial that I voted for stien, but I’m not ashamed, I’m proud that I did.

But I’m not afraid to be who I am and I don’t want to have to conform for other strangers just to use a service. I’d rather we be ourselves and celebrate that we are here on this app

Yeah I learned that you can’t say about a Foss developer wasting resources even when they do fundraiser and apply for grants

I had a fun time trying to explain why I voted for stien, I had to tell people the president part of the ballot is the one I have the least impact on and If people were to convince me not vote stien that is leave that part blank

Is this sincere? I’m curious if people are sinophobic or anti Russian.

Lol I have pointed out that Russia hasn’t dropped nuke in Ukraine but America has dropped nukes on Japan.

This helps probably should post it for posterity