

Did you tell him about fuzzers yet?
Did you tell him about fuzzers yet?
It doesn’t make as good of a meme, but I think a better analog would be a house that looks fine on the outside, but is completely absurd on closer inspection. Like, random plumbing, 90% of which is unused. Five bedrooms and zero bathrooms. A basement door with no stairs behind it.
Exactly. This sounds like selection bias in action. If you’re sampling adults who have ADHD and asking if it’s better from when they were kids, you’ve already skewed the results beyond repair. You need to follow kids with ADHD into adulthood and see if it gets better.
Also, her pants wouldn’t fade into nothingness but on second thought I think the artist did the right thing…
Only a Sith Lord deals in absolutes
I don’t do much frontend work these days, but years ago, it felt like the defining feature of Bootstrap was the 12-column layout. Sure, it had fun buttons and other components, but the ability to trivially define multi-column layout without ripping your hair out was its raison d’être.
Now that we have flexbox, I’m not sure anyone needs Bootstrap.
Lieutenant Commander Dat Ass
Yeah, exactly. I don’t get it.
Hehe, I was just poking fun. I love FOSS and don’t disagree intellectually with this stuff, but the way it’s presented is a little off-putting to me. A bit too dogmatic for me.
You can’t do incremental builds with just
. I don’t see how it’s a replacement?
If Data had feelings, he’d be very upset right now.
malloc
?One is his name, the other is not
Usually I remember the inflection and number of syllables of the word I want, just not the actual sounds.
Are you arguing that assembly languages are not architecture-specific? I don’t think that’s the typical definition.
Nasm is an assembler, but it also represents a specific assembly language targeting x86 architectures.
Gas is an assembler of a higher order. It can emit code for many architectures, and thus it accepts many different architecture-specific assembly languages.
You can also “simply” raw-dog Wireguard. It’s built into the Linux kernel, so you barely have to install anything besides the userspace tools.
Basically, I objected to being reliant on the generosity of a for-profit company. “We do these things not because they are easy, but because we thought they would be easy.”
This is a rough sketch:
wg-quick
.Boom. Tailscale’d.
I’m sure I’ve forgotten some steps. I have some janky automation that’s broken in a new way every time I try to use it.
I have no opinion of them, but I’m curious why advertising would imply untrustworthiness. Are you saying they’re too eager or something? Spending money on ads is also consistent with a company that’s making money by charging for a service — I’d be more suspicious of free VPNs.
They only have three fingers 🤔