Even if we take into consideration that 90% (out of 25) could be lying (they aren’t), that’s still ~3 women he assaulted.

Edit: Damn y’all, thanks for that old internet feeling I keep coming back to Lemmy for. Not a girl in sight in these comments.

Is testifying under oath not considered evidence? There have been so many credible lawsuits against this guy for sexual assault. Honestly what are these files going to prove that we don’t already have plenty of evidence for?

And lastly, do you have any idea what going after a rich powerful man for sexually assaulting you does to your life? Why the fuck would anybody put themselves through that if they weren’t absolutely sure they had a credible case? Some of the plaintiffs in these cases had their lives and their family’s lives threatened and disrupted.

Welp, to the bottom with me I suppose.

  • ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 days ago

    Having the evidence needed to convict is different than evidence to no longer trust and shun.

    With 20+ woman making accusations, being friends with a known pedophile and literally having recordings of him bragging about sexually assaulting women and bragging about going backstage with undressed teen girls the world shouldn’t need any more evidence. The honest and rational world doesn’t in fact.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      Convictions are important going up against the rich and powerful. They live lives where they don’t have to care what us plebians think.