Even if we take into consideration that 90% (out of 25) could be lying (they aren’t), that’s still ~3 women he assaulted.
Edit: Damn y’all, thanks for that old internet feeling I keep coming back to Lemmy for. Not a girl in sight in these comments.
Is testifying under oath not considered evidence? There have been so many credible lawsuits against this guy for sexual assault. Honestly what are these files going to prove that we don’t already have plenty of evidence for?
And lastly, do you have any idea what going after a rich powerful man for sexually assaulting you does to your life? Why the fuck would anybody put themselves through that if they weren’t absolutely sure they had a credible case? Some of the plaintiffs in these cases had their lives and their family’s lives threatened and disrupted.
Welp, to the bottom with me I suppose.
So after reading this linked wiki article I find a couple interesting points of the above description.
1 relentless requests
2 pretense of civility and sincerity
So I’ll ask you a couple questions, if you don’t mind answering (and much thanks to you if you do answer them)
As I don’t observe either of the points in your comment in this thread, if I were to go look at your comment history, and I wont because I don’t care to spend any effort to do so, will I find a history of you asking for evidence on this specific topic, as if you were looking for opportunities to do so, Cherry picking as one might call it?
And also how often would you say someone accuses you of sea lioning beer on Lemmy?
I’m asking because I’m betting the answers are no and hardly ever
It’s frustrating when people try to eject to from a discussion because they ascribe motives you don’t possess, at least in my experience if it does
Behaviour of sealion is only right course of action if someone just accused it of something that would destroy its life and reputation.