• Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      It is incredibly difficult for me to describe just how powerful a Linux desktop experience can be. You can buy a cheap computer that suports emulation and put QubesOS on it. Bonus points to putting a GPU in it and playing on either Windows or Linux with that GPU.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        I don’t think Linux people entirely understand just how uninviting the prospect of messing around with an operating system is for the vast majority of the public.

        As bad as Windows is, and it is it getting worse by the minute, it honestly does just work. I dual boot my computer, mostly into Linux everyday and even now I occasionally come across problems that don’t exist on the Windows side. The community need give up with this idea that Linux doesn’t have major usability issues.

        • Mîm@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          The fuck are you doing, that you need to mess with the OS?

        • Redredme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          12 days ago

          Yeah it’s funny. Post about stuff just working out of the box.

          First reply: Open source. Downgrade. So… Do exactly what the post is raging about.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            There are many advantages to open source software and a lot of it does actually just work. Linux isn’t one of them though.

            To be fair that’s because an operating system is far more complicated than most open source projects which tend to be applications.

  • Sc00ter@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    I went to a coffee shop yesterday that tried to tell me they only accepted orders through their app. I almost walked out, until the finally poured my coffee, but continued to give me shit about it, “ok but next time you have to use the app”

    “Yea no. There will be no next time.”

    • Meron35@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      Luckin Coffee, the extremely successful Chinese competitor to Starbucks exclusively operates via their app. Sadly, users prefer it because of all the discounts and coupons it offers. So really, just surveillance capitalism as usual.

      • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        No, even QR I can only accept as an option, as in completely optional. I’m out and about without a phone quite frequently.

        • Mandrilleren@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          I have my phone on me all the time. Still no way im using an app to order. The screens I can tolerate at fastfood joints because it gives me time to decide.

          But if you can’t be bothered to come to my table to ask what I want at a real restaurant, I can’t be bothered to go to your > resturant.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            OP said coffee shop so I’m presuming it’s not a real restaurant, and the app would facilitate ordering without queueing. Which I like. But I don’t wanna download an app, I want to just sit down, scan a QR and pay with one of the cards stored in my phone. And obviously cash should still be a backup option. I can see why they might want to do away with card terminals though.

            • Mandrilleren@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 days ago

              True. I would put coffee shops in group with the fasfodd joints. There’s wasn’t really much service to begin with. But it should always be possible to order by a real person.

              I wonder if it isn’t actually illegal to deny personal service for accessibility reasons.

              • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 days ago

                Honestly, no idea. Laws vary so much by jurisdiction anyway.

                Tbh I agree that there should be an in-person option always. If for no other reason then just to be able to pay in cash. Just make sure to let people know it’s not the most convenient option but it’s available.

                I’m not entirely sure what the point of the app is though, compared to a website with payment options. Lots of people will say tracking, but you can get a lot of info through a browser too.

    • LostXOR@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      How else are you supposed to see the live stream from inside it, and get progress notifications and ads?

      • MNByChoice@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        I would actually like a live stream of the dishwasher. I bet it is gross as hell. (“Technology Connections”, a Youtube channel, cut a hole in one so they could film it doing its thing.)

        • LostXOR@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          Yeah that would be a somewhat cool feature, but it could also be accomplished with a simple pane of glass.

  • 𒉀TheGuyTM3𒉁@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication (a bit ironic when you consider this quote comes from Apple).

    Steam is fun and all, minecraft is a great game, but goddamn, i have a 10kbps at home, and network is unstable where i live, why can’t i play my fcking game “licence” which is not even online based, because the network decided to stop??

    I prefer from far a simple folder with assets and a .exe that i will put on my desktop with a shortcut.

    What an application is supposed to be anyways.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 days ago

        You don’t need a network connection for Minecraft single player. I’m not actually sure what they’re on about.

    • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      Simplicity is easy to pirate though.

      If the product is a program that executes 100% of its functionality on your computer, it is impossible to make it pirate-proof. Even if all the functionality is client-side and the server is used only for authentication, it can be pirated.

      The only way to make a program pirate-proof is if it runs on the server with a thin client.

      That being said, some products execute on the client. Therefore if they want to prevent piracy, the only thing they can do is security through obscurity. That is, make it as complex as possible so the pirates take as much time as possible to reverse-engineer it.

  • BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 days ago

    I helped my dad install a new dumb thermostat last winter. We just had to drill a couple of new holes to mount it, and moved the wires over. Boom,there was heat again. I thought about how much of a pain in the ass it was to get my Ecobee working, and how refreshing it was to just have something work immediately.

    It’s a very similar feeling to playing my GameBoy Color again after messing around with retro gaming linux handhelds. You just turn it on and play, then just turn it off. No boot sequences, no emulator settings to tweak. No SD card corruption that ruins your game library. Just on and off.

    • uuldika@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      No boot sequences

      (being annoyingly pedantic) technically there is a boot sequence: the Gameboy logo. on the DMG there’s a little blob of code from 0x0000 to 0x00ff that clears some memory, sets up the screen, reads the logo from cartridge memory and scrolls it. the loader only jumps to the game if the logo is byte-identical (the idea being that unlicensed games could be sued for trademark infringement.)

      on the GBC the loader is a little beefier but mostly the same.

      t. made a horribly broken FPGA core for the DMG that got just far enough to load the Tetris intro

    • drgeppo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      it’s the reason why the original Odroid Go it’s so special to me… it’s all built around an ESP32 microcontroller and it does emulate only NES, GB, GBC and a couple more, while honestly not even being perfect at it, but goddamn… it boots in like 1 second, even directly to the last game you were playing, it has no settings whatsoever, the battery lasts for like 7 hours it’s such a neat little device.

      and it’s funny because in my head that it’s the device that kickstarted this whole retro handheld emulation craze, but it is the only one to take such a minimalistic approach

    • CarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      It’s not comparable. Nintendo must have spent millions on developing the Game Boy, meanwhile retro handheld is a hobby project someone did over the quarter. Ever try to port and run an RTOS on those ARM chips? And port a mainstream Game Boy emulator to it? “What do you mean you have to have MMU support?Just work, damnit?”

      It doesn’t work like that.

      • BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        It’s completely comparable in this circumstance. They are performing similar functions, playing handheld games. My R36S is a pretty impressive little device, and it performs excellently at playing games. But using it is much more complicated and longer than popping a game in a gameboy.

        Gameboy: insert game, turn on, play, turn off. R36S: turn on, 30-40 second boot time, locate game, play, exit emulator, shut down, 10 second shutdown time.

        • CarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          Sir, I sincerely think you missed the point. Somebody, that nobody who only knows just enough programming, spent three months (at most) in his basement, putting together a embedded Linux and integrated emulators in a portable computer, cannot be compared with a video game company’s officially released commercial product. The money, the time, the effort, the equipment, the testing, not one is in the same magnitude.

          Sponsor a group of enthusiasts who have the right skill to live for a year, they can replicate Game Boy with modern hardware too, 100% identical or even better. Consumers like us who only paid $20 for the retro handheld emulator? We don’t have a right to complain about the performance and quality.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 days ago

    I rented a car, a Mercedes B class or something

    Everytime I started it, it would ask me to sign up for some bullshit Mercedes service Half the features of the car were disabled due to requiring subscriptions

    I will NEVER buy that car nor rent it ever again

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 days ago

    What fantasy world are you living in? How could my glass hold water if I didn’t sign up for a service that sends me spam? How could my table hold a book if I didn’t sign up for the monthly subscription that prevents it from ejecting books into the air? Even my cat came with a ToS that said that by petting her, I give her access to my bank account and first born child. Hasn’t it always been this way?

  • loomy@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 days ago

    I used a normal wired phone the other day.

    I picked it up and called people.

    It blew my mind.

      • papalonian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        No you don’t understand, you can’t do that anymore. Because um, everything is actually really bad and enshittified. Wait you bought a not-smart TV to avoid the wifi and ads and such? Um yeah you can’t do that… same with kitchen appliances and everything else. You HAVE to get the wifi version so you can complain online.

        I had to watch a 45 minute ad to post this

      • chunes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        click the calls app and click the contact

        Two things you don’t have to do on a dedicated phone. I bet you had to unlock your phone first, too.

        • edwardbear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          on a dedicated phone you had dedicated phone. No call history, no phonebook, no call log. So yes, it is technically more taps to get to the dialing stage. But it’s faster overall

          • Zoot@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            Plenty of the handheld dedicated phones had caller id, and a contacts page. But at that point it’s no longer a corded rotary phone with the fun clicks and clacks you get watching the dialer go from 7 to 0, and 5 to 0, and etc.

            • edwardbear@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 days ago

              My point was more in the tone of, the dialing on a smartphone is the tiniest problem that those devices have. Just kill social media. Yes, lemmy included. This human experiment failed and the repercussions are incalculable.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    I really wanna ditch the smart TV I have and just get a display that only displays the picture of the devices I have plugged into its inputs and doesn’t get online, doesn’t receive updates or “improvements” and has inputs for everything:

    3.5mm AUX audio

    Composite

    S-video

    RGB

    Hdmi

    That optical audio jack made by (IIRC) Sony I can’t remember the name of right now. It’s what my stereo uses and it’s amazing. Used to be super common on TVs.

    • ApatheticCactus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 days ago

      I recently got really tired of my TV constantly nagging me to update the firmware for all the newest features. I just disconnected it from wifi instead. I do not use my TV for smart features, I use it as a display. I update the things plugged into it, because that’s their job. If i need to stream something, I will use a box. A box that can be replaced or easily updated or changed out.

      A display has one job, to display whatever.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      I mean I have that. It’s called a smart TV that I never use the smart functions of, connected to the HDMI output of a PC. It’s great for watching stream content and I don’t have to worry about ads and stuff.

      In actual fairness to the TV it isn’t too bad in that respect but the interface is just god awful and I hate having to type with a TV remote so I still use the PC.

    • 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      TOSLINK might be what you’re thinking of. And yes, it rules! I have a surround system that uses it and it sounds amazing

    • ...m...@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      …TOSLINK can’t handle atmos bandwidth; you need eARC for uncompressed multichannel digital audio…

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        I had fun with eARC a while ago, my TV definitely supports it because it was on the box but what it doesn’t say is the fact that only one of the HDMI port supports it and it doesn’t tell you which one. I had to go online into a random forum to find out, It’s port 3 by the way, because that makes perfect sense.

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 days ago

    Shit either has no buttons, with an capacitive touch surface, or if it has buttons, it’s never immediate response, you have to press it for an extended amount of time.

    it’s fucking infuriating.

    • salacious_coaster@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      You just described my Chevy Volt so accurately. All the buttons are touch surface except the parking brake switch, and I usually have to pull that twice.