Star Wars universe does have lasers of all scales and power levels.

Yet literally no one uses them well on a personal scale.

The Jedi (and Sith for that matter) imbue it with a power of magical stone, and then…use it as a saber.

To balance this stupidity, stormtroopers, clones and droids all use slow, non-continuous energy blasters. With actual lasers, they could insta-kill any Jedi, but they cannot, because otherwise the movie wouldn’t exist.

    • Matengor@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      14 days ago

      You can’t stress that enough. I love sci-fi, but I never really fancied Star Wars.

      Now, as a dad, I rewatch the movies and replay scenes with my son, and the similarity with fantasy action movies strikes me. For example, the beautiful display of alien species and habitats.

    • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      We don’t need to split hairs - ‘sci-fi fantasy’ or ‘science fantasy’ is a real genre and common enough term.

    • adaveinthelife@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      Laser swords and biological powers beyond our current grasp of the science behind them define it as science fiction.

      I get it’s the quirky pickme trend to argue over this and I agree about the fantasy elements but don’t be the ‘actually’ guy in the room.

      • kameecoding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        Not really, in LoTr, they have a magical sword that shines around orcs, another one that can stop a ghost sword, and there are being with biological powers beyond the grasp of our understanding.

        I think you are confusing setting with genre. By your logic the star wars and star trek porn parodies are also sci-fi and not porn.

        Sci-fi is only sci-fi if science plays an integral role in the story, eg. Expanse, Stargate (shows), Star trek. But these are all arguably in space, so I get your confusion, that’s the setting, shows like Black Mirror and For all mankind are also sci-fi and those are present day things.

        Well actually For all mankind plays out in an alternate past where the space race continues (though I guess this is also technically in space).

        Black mirror explores humanity through the lense of abusing technological/scientific inventions.

        So those are science based fictions, sci-fi.

        Star Wars is space fantasy, arguably if we live in an alternate universe and the original trilogy is released in the late 2000s and 2010s they could be dubbed as YA. Random teenager protagonist finds out they are indeed special and helps to overthrow an opressive regime, like Divergent, Hunger games, Maze runner

          • kameecoding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            13 days ago

            Who said Lotr is sci-fi?

            I used LotR explicitly to show that Star Wars is closer to that and therefore a fantasy than it is to any well-known sci-fi.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    14 days ago

    Pictured are space-bombers. They drop gravity bombs… in space. Please stop talking about scientific accuracy in Star Wars.

    • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      I remember seeing this shit in theaters and losing my mind over how stupid it was. It’s in the middle of an incredibly bad movie anyway which doesn’t help, but I just can’t imagine how many people had to be involved with this creative choice and how ar least some of them must have brought up how stupid dropping bombs like that is in a space fight and yet they still went with it. Dumbest shit ever.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Yeah, to add on to this:

      At least back in the 90s/00s, the canon explanation from various books and such is roughly…

      The ‘lasers’ are actually coherent ‘bolts’ of highly energetic plasma, ie, gas excited/heated to the point that electrons are breaking out of their atomic orbitals, extremely thermally hot, capable of doing immense burn damage, melting a hole through you or most other armors/materials/alloys.

      The explanation is that ‘laser’ weapons, and ‘turbolaser’ canons… by some arcane process, as the plasma travels through the barrel of the weapon, it is somehow encased in, or enveloped by, or transformed into having a very strong, self contained psuedo-magnetic forcefield, that keeps the plasma from just immediately expanding in all directions upon exiting the barrel, and keeps it vaguely spatially constrained and coherent.

      It is supposed to be a sort of analogy to how rifling in a conventional firearm makes the bullet much more accurate… and it also kind of intuitively thus makes sense that a big, fuck off huge barrel, can throw a larger projectile downrange, and faster.

      Its also sort of how a rail gun or coil gun works in real life, but not really.

      In universe, plasma bolts do not travel at light speed, they also do not travel forever: they dissapate and sort of evaporate or fizzle out after travelling a certain distance, and this generally occurs more quickly from smaller weapons than it does from larger weapons.

      Basically, their ‘coherence field’ is only stable for a short time, sort of like a gel capsule for a drug dissolves in your stomach after a certain amount of time.

      This is again another rough analogy to real world ballistics with solid bullets or shells… irl, longer barrels are able to increase the kinetic emergy imparted to a projectile, thus increasing its muzzle velocity, thus increasing its effective range.

      Ammo is also a thing that exists in a lot of older Star Wars canon. A blaster will eventually run out of the… plasma fuel, which is often contained in essentially a magazine… and technically, all blasters also need either the rough equivalent of a starter engine, or an independent battery/‘ignition’ system to actually do the process of transforming the ‘ammo’ into a plasma bolt, and accelerate it out of the barrel and cohere it into a bolt.

      I also recall Tibanna gas, from Cloud City, being specifically mentioned as a primary component of blaster ammunition in at least one of the Rogue Squadron games, though it apparently gets more complicated with different colored plasma bolts essentially being made of different blends of different kinds of input materials having different properties and only working properly in certain kinds of blasters, again, a sort of rough analogy to different calibers of bullets and barrels and chambers.

      Light sabers follow a similar overall principle of ‘plasma bolt contained by some kind of coherence field’… but they use totally different internals to generate both the plasma and coherence field, and can seemingly just… do this nearly infinitely, never needing to ‘reload’, never running out of energy.

      Those internals?

      Magic (kyber) crystals and an extremely esoteric, basically electronic circuit design.

      This is why so much emphasis is placed on a Jedi constructing their own lightsaber as a fundamental rite of passage:

      Every lightsaber is bespoke, unique, you have to be essentially supernaturally intelligent, ie, sufficiently in tune with the Force, to be able to comprehend how to actually construct one… and indeed, there are at least a few instances or mentions of where someone attempts this, fucks it up, and their malformed lightsaber basically blows up in their face.

      You can also see the ‘coherence’ principle at play as a light saber… well the ‘blade’ grows out of the hilt, as the coherence field expands… but it never disconnects, it never expels the plasma bolt away from the hilt.

      So, if everything, lightsaber ‘blades’ and plasma ‘bolts’ are both encapsulated by some sort of pseudo magnetic coherence field, it makes some amount ofintuitive sense that if you get them close to each other, they will repel, deflect, ricochet.

      … But, this cannot be just the electromagnetic force as we understand it in our world, because… well, that shit doesn’t actually make any sense by our understanding of physics.

      We have no idea how to create a self sustaining magnetic field that can be projected away from the source of what created the field and just… keeps sustaining itself on its own…

      And EM is just + or -, either attactive or repulsive, so we would expect to see say a + bolt and a + lightsaber be capable of deflection… but a + bolt and a - saber, or even a + saber and a - saber… well those should actually be attractive, so you’d end up with a bolt that curves toward a light saber and then combines with it, or even two sabers being drawn toward each other and then merging.

      In conclusion: Star Wars is science fantasy in the sense that it seems to operate under a… not completely alien, but significantly distinct set of basic laws of physics… you’d probably have to be a Jedi or Sith to truly understand how they actually work =P

      • Ketram@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        Maybe I’m just old, but I can’t stand how magic the " kyber" crystals are in the rewritten sequel canon. In older legends canon, there was no “the crystal chooses the Jedi blah blah blah” which really makes it seem incredibly religious. You could use nearly any focusing crystal in a lightsaber, and Jedi would often choose a crystal that is sentimental or meaningful to them. There was little to no magic, and lightsabers were cheap and simple to construct. It was more that no one but a force-user could bring a laser-sword to a laser-gun fight and not die immediately.

        I know I’m just not up with the times but I really loved old Star wars legends and how much emphasis it put on how these people who could use the force were normal people with exceptional abilities trying to interpret something much stranger and bigger than them (the force), and I feel like “kyber” crystals are a symptom of the very binary, new light vs. dark sequel canon which I find insanely reductive.

        So uh yeah, I know I’m just old but it really bothers me.

        P.S. Also isn’t the word “Kyber” just them bastardizing “Kaiburr” crystals (which were supposed to be rare lightsaber crystals)? I was pretty sure this was always the case.

        • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          I generally agree, with some nitpicks.

          The old canon several times mentions that wielding a lightsaber is actually extremely difficult and unintuitive…

          …because the ‘blade’ is literally weightless, that alone would throw off a lot of wielders of more conventional swords…

          … but also because the saber, potentially as a byproduct of the ‘coherence field,’… produces strong, unituitive gryoscopic forces when moved or rotated at various angles and speeds.

          The old explanation I remember is roughly that force sensitives essentially just intuitively know how to counteract this, to varying degrees of proficiency, but a non force sensitive, a non force user… they’d pick it up and awkwardly flail about with it as it seemingly gains and loses weight, is being pushed and pulled in crazy directions that make no sense compared to just, a physical sword or staff.

          Sort of like trying to use a very, very poorly balanced real world melee weapon, but the weapon’s poor balance also actively changes, like its center of gravity just seemingly randomly alters as you move it.

          Basically, a non force user fights the weapon, whereas a skilled force user understands it, and in a more physically tangible sense, literally allows the weapon to guide their combat movements and style, they know when to go ‘with’ it and when to go ‘against’ it, to achieve the actual desired motion.

          This is kind of sort of depicted in the Mandalorian, with the Darksaber seemingly becoming exhaustively heavy, massive, and Mando has to… learn how to use it, how to work with it.

          And also: yes, Han uses a lightsaber in the OT, but most of the early expanded universe did just explain that by saying he is actually force sensitive, that his absurd luck and piloting skill in various situations does mean he is actually a untrained force user, he just also is a stubborn ass who thinks the Force is bullshit, at least initially, lol.

          But anyway, yes, they used to make lightsabers out of a wider variety of crystals, not just ‘kyber’… and yes, i also do remember many different variants of how ‘kyber’ was actually spelled.

          For the life of me I thought its proper spelling was ‘khyber’ until i bothered to look it up in an actual wiki in the last couple of months.

          That could be me misremembering, or maybe that was what I originally read decades ago now, or maybe what i am rembering got ‘telephoned’ through a bunch of people first, on some forum.

          …Man now I kinda want to set up SWGEmu, hahahah!

          • Ketram@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            Thanks for the clarification. I remember the gyroscopic weight stuff somewhat, but always sorta dismissed it since it felt like it was selectively used by authors and many of my favorites made little to no mention of it.

            I haven’t had much desire to watch any of the new stuff since Force Awakens so I’m not up to snuff on the new stuff. Keep on enjoying it though! Makes me want to go back and read some of the best of legends.

            • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              I remember the gyroscopic weight stuff somewhat, but always sorta dismissed it since it felt like it was selectively used by authors and many of my favorites made little to no mention of it.

              I completely get what you mean on that.

              Personally, I wish it was more prevalent… I think the main reason it isn’t, is that… its actually fairly difficult to write a description of … what this would be like, and it is also difficult to depict this visually, both in still and moving images.

              Again this I will freely admit is my preference/opinion, but yeah, I really wish they had actually gone a bit further into this…

              Like with Frank Herbert, Dune, and the basically bizzare combat style that comes with the daggers and personal shields.

              The slow blade makes the cut, in that universe, literally, because the shields block things moving at high velocities, but not slow velocities.

              I just love the shit out of… physically based, but playing by different rules, martial combat, hahah!

              I also really like in say, Enders Game, where Ender has to essentially just learn/invent an entirely new paradigm of combat to work with zero G and the suits that constrict and paralyze theb part of your body that gets hit with whatever kind of weapons they use.

              Makes me want to go back and read some of the best of legends.

              I think I am just gonna do that.

              Somebody’s gotta tend to the old, sacred texts =P

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    star trek, and some other scifi genre captures it better, SW is more for children, it also magic-tech in it, so not really a true scifi.

    • erin@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 days ago

      SW is for children is not a great take. It’s just not sci-fi, and shouldn’t be judged as such. It’s a space fantasy, and it leans into the camp and the suspension of disbelief. They use wings and aerodynamics in space. Destroyed ships “sink.” The good guys never get hit and the bad guys die in one shot. Now, the new movies were absolutely disappointing, but Star Wars was never sci-fi, at least not in the ways this discussion is defining the genre.

  • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 days ago

    The OG trilogy was an interesting-enough drama with a vibrant setting, made groundbreaking by their special effects. Everything else in the franchise was made to sell toys, with maybe one or two exceptions. It’s not supposed to be taken seriously like that, I think…

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Iirc, that’s because none of the items mentioned in this post actually are lasers in the star wars universe. They’re actually supercharged bolts of plasma.

    Laser weapons are considered primitive tech. Like who wants a space gun that just fires into infinity? You might blow up something incredibly far away by mistske.

  • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    I have always wished for a serious grown up version of Star Wars. Like not being afraid to sever limbs like they used to, or worrying about your scoundrels being too scoundrel-y. Also really taking an inventory of everything and seriously thinking about how it would interact.

    Like to your point - no need to toss out the more magical force elements but maybe just tone it down a bit and ground them in reality a little better? Because it’s absolutely ridiculous how they’ve become these invincible laser blocking demigods. They should be afraid to deploy, just like anyone, if there’s going to be shooting. It’s just lazy writing most of the time and it would be wonderful to see what a skilled hand could actually do with it all.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      All they had to do for the Sequel Trilogy was adapt the Thrawn series.

      Absolutely you do not have to be 100% faithful, absolutelty you can change some bits and bobs around, overemphasize a character’s trait, underemphasize another, spend more or less run time developing certain people, relationships, etc.

      Adjust and rewrite parts of it to make more sense with the old cast of actors being older than their characters were in the Thrawn series… and/or use all that fancy de-aging / re-voicing / face transplanting tech they have used all over the place with many of the same actual actors on other projects.

      Its got new and old characters.

      Its got Mara Jade, a new main female character, who is actually compelling and complex and fleshed out.

      It respects the old characters, acknowledges their flaws and highlights their strengths. You actually see them face new struggles and have new failures in the actual temporal continuum of the plot… not as shoehorned momentary flashback/retcons to explain why someone is a completely different character now.

      Its got more mature and serious themes and character arcs.

      Its got an actually compelling main villain.

      Its got a secret shadow fleet of ships… but with an actually competent explanation for them.

      It got big ass space battles, and personal upfront altercations, its got strategizing and politics and intrigue.

      It even ends on a victorious… but not a ‘final’ victorious note, leaving the gate open for you to really try and do your own thing from then after.

      Its even already been functionally story boarded by being adapted into a comic book series.

      But nope, we instead got a bunch of disrepectful hacks who were convinced they could outdo everything prior, cast it all aside initially, and then started trying to copy parts of it after they realized how badly they’d fucked up.

      Fucking hacks.

      • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        I should go back and read that again, I remember loving it so much. Also remember when Disney announced that the extended universe would be discarded to make room for new cannon and how much my heart sank hearing it.

        • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          I fully support a reread!

          =D

          Also, because I am in nitpick mode:

          Canon is a body of work accepted as legitimate, official, standard, etc.

          Cannon is what you fire a cannonball with.

          =P

          Anyway, I’m off to go enjoy a dessert in a desert.

    • rowdy@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Agreed. Star Wars was never much my cup of tea - a bit too campy. That changed with Andor and Rogue One. Those are up there with my favorite movies/tv of all time.

      • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Rogue One was really close to what I want the franchise to be. Having a universe with the force users instead of about the force users is so much more interesting.

    • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Yeah like force speed. You have that ability, yet you used it only once. Would have been pretty handy like a hundred times in various sticky situations.

      • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Yeah it’s so damn lazy, like they introduce these things like they’re in a vaccum, situationally just to have a cool scene and toss any kind of continuity aside