• Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sending a temp updates to your phone so you don’t have to be standing near it the whole time is a nice feature.

    • 5too@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Okay, I’m not a huge griller, but wouldn’t it be better just to build in a thermostat? Let it maintain its own temperature?

      • Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Commercial grills do exactly that. There’s just a thermostat built into the gas valve which uses a sensing bulb to modulate the gas flow based on actual temp and set temp. They don’t even need electricity let alone wifi.

      • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Sometimes you need cook on different temperatures at different periods. Sometimes you want to set it to cool down or heat up and instead of waiting near it, you could just set the target and let your phone ding when it’s time.

    • howrar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I agree, but that should be a separate device. One that I can use in any grill or oven. There’s no reason for the grill itself to have that feature, especially if it can potentially brick the whole thing.

      • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Sometimes I just need a device that can do what I want it to do. Obviously I don’t want a device that can be bricked, but that’s just a shitty programming, not a condemnation of the whole concept. I have a whole host of devices that never brick themselves, and I intend to get more.