0x0@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 4 days agorace conditionslemmy.zipimagemessage-square90fedilinkarrow-up1873arrow-down125
arrow-up1848arrow-down1imagerace conditionslemmy.zip0x0@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 4 days agomessage-square90fedilink
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devcakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoFun fact, some languages are not turing complete and I believe people would still consider them programming languages. They’re typically targeted at making mathematical proofs.
minus-squarenialv7@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 days agoI did say “general purpose”. And many proof assistants are Turing Complete actually, such as Lean.
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devcakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days ago I did say “general purpose”. I did say “fun fact”.
Fun fact, some languages are not turing complete and I believe people would still consider them programming languages. They’re typically targeted at making mathematical proofs.
I did say “general purpose”. And many proof assistants are Turing Complete actually, such as Lean.
I did say “fun fact”.