• CircaV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s correct. I want an immediate end to Canada selling discounted oil, gas and hydroelectricity to the US.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    What is it with Trump and always “being subsidized by us” and “take away from us” while the US has trillions of debt in other countries? 300 billions to my home country alone, which doesn’t even compare to some other countries.

    • AtomicPinecone@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      He is incapable of understanding mutual trade and cooperation. To him every human interaction must have a winner and a loser. So if Canada is benefiting from trade with the US in his mind it must be at America’s expense. It’s a disturbingly simple view of trade and cooperation, and one that makes actual good faith discourse with the US near impossible.

  • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    “increase your military power for free”… what’s the portion of the federal budget that is allocated to defense again ?

  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Man, the dumbest thing about this nonsense is repeating that Canada will only be one state. It’s already broken into provinces, dickhead, at least make a better offer than two senators.

    • lorty@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Let’s be honest here it’s going to be just a territory for quite a while.

    • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      #1 Ontario being the population of Pennsylvania

      #9 New foundland being the population of Wyoming

      #10 Prince Edward Island only has 150k, could lump in 150k from northern territories

      20 senators for 40m, 5.0E-7 senators per person

      200 senators for 340m, 5.88E-7 senators per person

      It seems pretty fair

      • Landless2029@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’d love to have the Canadian conservatives in the USA. It would hopefully calm down the magat zombies we have in office.

  • CircaV@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Will. Never. Happen.

    Canadians will literally die before living for a milisecond as Americans.

    And - this is a declaration of war by the US president. Cause it would take a military invasion to violently turn Canadians into Americans.

    • Oaksey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      It has long been the case, that if you confuse a Canadian for an American they are offended, but if you confuse an American for a Canadian they don’t mind.

  • thefartographer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s like a truck carrying punctuation got into an accident with a train carrying words. This is so hard to read.

  • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Hypothetically, if canada becomes a state, would they flip our house of representatives blue? I guess more likely they’ll become like puerto rico or guam or something.

    • paperazzi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yes, indeed. If you check out Poilievre’s platform, he almost entirely mimics Trump’s, right down to promoting Canada’s own version of DOGE. That’s why there was such a huge turnout at the voting booths. The writing was on the wall with that guy and becoming American was not what the majority of us wanted.

    • AtomicPinecone@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well Poilievre, who’s party lost tonight, has been extremely limp-wristed in his opposition to Trump’s threats, but he hasn’t outright said he’d surrender, just implied it with his weak rhetoric. More likely to me is that Trump in his dementia ridden mind was literally calling for people to vote for him. Like somehow enough Canadians would write Trump on their ballots that it would “win” the election for him, which demonstrates such a fundamental lack of understanding about our electoral system that I don’t even know where to begin.

  • pseudo@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Is my English grammar lacking or is there something wrong with the “if” in the first sentence? Shouldn’t that be a “by” ("by Canada becoming […] )?

    • BigPotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Commas can be used to identify parts of the sentence that can be cut out e.g. “… wisdom to cut your taxes in half … If Canada becomes the 51st state.”

      Now, here, the comma was used for a list so it shouldn’t have been used that way but I’m sure his meth head brain probably got lost partway or the AI bot that mimics his speech patterns is just that dumb.

      • pseudo@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I don’t have an issue with his use of comma but I found it weird to say “Elect the man who has the strength […] to cut your taxes in half, […] if Canada become the cherished 51sts state of the [USA]”
        But English is not my mother tongue, so it could just be language interference.

        • BigPotato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          No, it’s terrible. Your English is better than his. Just because there’s some sliver of sense doesn’t mean he even did it on purpose.

    • db2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m still trying to figure out how everything in the last 15ish years isn’t. Why do we have to be in the dumbest timeline.

      • blargle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        This is actually one of the most interesting and entertaining timelines.

        There was only supposed to be enough source data to make it to 2012- and that was originally a very generous buffer, since a fraction of a percent of Earths last more than 10 years after both networked computers and nuclear weapons have been invented in-simulation.

        So, the operators decided not to pull the plug and just let this one run its course.

        As it extrapolates history farther and farther outside of the initial parameters, the simulator is cannibalizing itself with feedback and undergoing model collapse.