• ameancow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    5 months ago

    Most people don’t get the thought experiment at all.

    I’ve seen 300+ deep comment chains on reddit with people arguing bitterly back and forth if a monkey could even operate a typewriter, and how it’s absolutely impossible to get monkeys to type out a book, etc, etc, etc.

    I hate it here.

    • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think too many people don’t consider the monkey is not supposed to be making decisions, it’s just supposed to be inputting anything, literally anything, on a typewriter.

      Like a random value generator, for typewriter keys.

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        You could get the same result throwing an infinite number of typewriters down an infinitely long mineshaft, but there will be even fewer people who would understand it 😭

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Worse, creationists use the “watch maker’s paradox” as evidence of creation. Same idea but watch parts in a washing machine.

          • ameancow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I have argued with plenty of theists, they tend to cherry-pick parts of every idea to validate their extreme fear of death/God, so they hyper-fixate on the idea that “fantastic things” can happen with infinities, without addressing the problems that also come from infinities.

            The idea behind the monkeys/typewriters thought experiment is to highlight just how problematic actual infinities would be in our universe, it’s an argument against things like gods occuring, because in an infinite, unbounded universe there would be an infinite number of infinitely powerful beings negating each other all out over large enough scales.

      • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        I mean, if they are actually monkeys who don’t know to type, some of them will still press keys once or twice. And if there’s infinite monkeys, they will still type it out.

        • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Hell, if you have infinite time and infinite typewriters, you don’t even need the monkeys. You could probably depend on hail pressing those keys, the argument still stands. As long as there are inputs, ever.

          • ameancow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Given long enough periods of time, if your typewriters were magically immune to entropy, they would eventually start quantum teleporting into each other, and eventually would accidentally create perfect clockwork mecha-godzilla made entirely out of typewriters.

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          If you’re talking magical, biologically accurate monkeys, then they will eventually shit out models of every scene of your life, replicated in perfect detail in monkey feces. Not just once, but an infinite number of times, and also in every possible configuration your life may have ever existed in, every choice you could have made. An infinite number of times.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      The funny thing is, if you truly have infinite monkeys, it doesn’t matter if they’re using it correctly or not. There is an infinite amount of them.