Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoYEEETslrpnk.netimagemessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1554arrow-down18
arrow-up1546arrow-down1imageYEEETslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square27fedilink
minus-squareVenator@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up18·edit-22 years agoThe silhouette wouldn’t change as much as in that image, it would probably be more like the image in this article: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/was-spinosaurus-a-bison-backed-dinosaur-12849430/ If you look at the silhouette of the bison vs it’s bones the muscle still doesn’t extend that far above the bones, but has more volume around the bones.
The silhouette wouldn’t change as much as in that image, it would probably be more like the image in this article: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/was-spinosaurus-a-bison-backed-dinosaur-12849430/
If you look at the silhouette of the bison vs it’s bones the muscle still doesn’t extend that far above the bones, but has more volume around the bones.