• sndmn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ve never seen a magnet link respond with “this is not available in your country”.

  • Chozo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Weird, Netflix used to compete with piracy so well that many people stopped pirating altogether, by offering a more convenient service at a reasonable price that was hard for even the most stubborn of pirates to refuse and resulted in a massive boom for its own industry. I wonder what could have changed that caused the people to leave Netflix and return to piracy. Hmm. I wonder.

    • DashboTreeFrog@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I used to sail the seas like freakin Luffy, but Netflix and Steam (plus becoming a wage earning adult) got me on the straight and narrow for a good long while. Then when all the different services started to compete I started dipping my toes in the water again with some sense of guilt. But after various struggles getting Netflix running in different locations I frequent and my parents not being able to use my account anymore, I have no shame flying the Jolly Roger.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Everyone decided they wanted to have their own streaming and wanted a bigger piece of the pie. That fragmented where to watch and caused old shows and movies to cost way more for streaming rights.

      Then Netflix cancels too many originals without proper endings, which passes people off. After that they got rid of password sharing which made it a pain to have a work and home type of viewing experience. Now they’re adding ads. They’ve become shit and now it’s making it a bit harder for themselves.

  • WatDabney@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    No - piracy, since it always carries at least some amount of difficulty and risk, is easy to compete against. And in fact, paid services, including Netflix, have proven that over and over. All it takes is to offer dependable convenience and quality and to treat customers well. People are always willing to pay a reasonable price for that.

    The problem is that piracy becomes difficult to compete against when, as Netflix is currently doing, you shift from a business model of providing good service under fair terms for a reasonable price to a business model of providing crappy service under onerous terms for too much money, because the greedy, selfish, short-sighted sacks of shit at the top want to make even more obscene amounts of money. That’s the point at which piracy gains enough of an advantage to outweigh its difficulties and risks.

    And when that’s the case, it’s pretty obvious what the real problem is.

    • variants@possumpat.io
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The trick is to make as much money as possible then jump ship to a newer competing company that has the ability to grow more before you leech it to death again

  • shrugal@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Piracy isn’t even free! People pay thousands of dollars for hardware, and hundreds per year for electricity and various service providers.

    But they actually get what they want for that money: Being able to watch whatever you want, anytime, on any device, in high quality and without ads. It must be really hard for streaming services to compete with features as futuristic as that!

    • quirzle@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Seriously. I’m running a Synology with 12x16TB. That’d buy a bunch of months of streaming services…but this way actually gives me content to watch that I want to watch.

  • wolo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    “We successfully competed against piracy and drove it to near-extinction, but now that we’re enshittified we can’t compete with piracy while continuing to make the obscene amounts of money that we want to make”

  • flathead@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Operating Revenue: 33,723,297,000

    Cost of Revenue: 19,715,368,000

    Gross Profit: 14,007,929,000

    Operating Expense: 7,053,926,000

    Operating Income: 6,954,003,000

  • DevilOfDoom@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    As Lord Gaben once said: Piracy is a service problem.

    Make better service, have less piracy.

    • Legoraft@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Spotify is a good example of this imo, I can listen everything, so it’s not necessary to pirate music. I do have some issues, but never had the problem of not being able to listen what I want

      • Specal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        And they have Spotify DJ, which not everyone likes but I think it’s great, worth the £10 a month to me

  • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Everyone is blaming Netflix, but it’s not their fault.

    It’s the fault of the content owners. Disney, fox, paramount etc……

    Rather than make a little money off of Netflix, they decided they could scam more money by launching their own competing service

  • 0110010001100010@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    So here’s a novel idea, maybe stop driving people away from your business with constant rate-hikes, removal of content, killing new shows after 1 season, etc…

  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    piracy is not a pricing issue. It’s a service issue.

    - Gabe Newell

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      But 2013 Netflix didn’t have to compete with Prime Video, Disney Plus, Paramount Plus, HBO Max, Apple TV, Hulu, Peacock, or any of the million “add-on” channels that Amazon uses as an excuse to paywall you off from the content.

      The fact that they all run in their own UI, desperate the shove the next instalment of mediocrity down your throat, means that I’ve gone back to piracy. It’s just much easier to type what I’m after into Radarr or Sonarr than it is to go through the services to see what’s available. Sure, I can use Justwatch, but 80% of the time what I’m after isn’t on anything I have.

      • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        More competition should mean lower prices. How is competition diving prices up? Seems rigged.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Same amount of content, more players, outbidding each other, passing on those lovely reverse savings.

          See if it was like music, with a massive back catalogue available to everyone, you’d have four or five services competing on price. But it isn’t. And it will suffer for that.

  • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Netflix: This problem we practically solved ten years ago but have been steadily and diligently working to bring back pledge to double down on those efforts and eventually make it the only viable option for a good consumer experience.

    • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Netflix used to have plenty of content people wanted to watch, and you could share your account with family in different physical houses. Now neither is true.

      Netflix: “why would pirates do this?”

      • Banzai51@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It wasn’t Netflix’s decision to pull the content people wanted to watch. That was content creators like Disney that pulled their content to start their new streaming services. Netflix was stuck with creating their own content, which as it turns out is hard.

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          It was Netflix’s decision to add ads to paid subscriptions and limit browsers to 720p even for accounts that pay for 4k. Neflix isn’t the only cause, but they are part of the problem