• scytale@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    21 days ago

    There’s more, but it feels less because it’s quantity over quality. There’s so much more content but the quality has degraded that finding something of good quality in a sea of crap and slop is becoming a challenge.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    I think there’s more good stuff out there than ever, but:

    • We don’t have a good search engine to locate it.
    • It’s easier than ever to put stuff out there, so it’s lower quality on average.
    • People hide their stuff inside discord servers and, increasingly, behind paywalls.
    • emb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      Right! It’s not that there’s less. It’s that there’s a discoverability issue, and on top of that more stuff means less cultural relevance for any given work.

  • Krudler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 days ago

    Everything and every platform has become gamified and there’s no room for true artistic creation anymore.

  • JeSuisUnHombre@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 days ago

    I think part of it is people leaving the biggest platforms, making everything more decentralized but still on proprietary servers so no federation. That and it’s tough out there right now.

    • blarghly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      You are suffering from selection bias, being the sort of person who is here on Lemmy. The vast majority of people who are making content are still posting to legacy platforms.

  • Profligate_parasite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    20 days ago

    A coworker showed me a quote from this guy, Steve Magness (https://www.stevemagness.com/) that sums it up really well - When we’re constantly ‘killing time’ on our phones/screens in every waking moment that our attention isn’t otherwise required, we suck up the space that was once reserved for creativity and fill it with garbage instead. We fragment our attention and rarely get lost in our thoughts or follow up on cool ideas. Creativity is dying first before it’s born because we don’t just sit and engage with our own ideas like we did once…we just scroll.

    The second factor is the giant, impossibly sophisticated psychological rat’s maze the internet has become for content… we are fed much more than we truly discover, and every day 100k tons more AI shit is shoveled over real, genuine ideas… and it’s that bullshit the algorithm will serve you. You have a lot less agency and exposure online than you THINK you do… and that is by design. If you have been on the internet for more than 10 years, then you remember when that was very much not the case and feel the difference.

    Hang out with local, creative people in person, ask them what they’re into. Stare out a window and think thoughts, shut your phone off and read books. The good news is that there is SO MUCH good shit in the world already that the decline of our civilization and its creative output isn’t so bad, if you just get some distance from it.

  • SaneMartigan@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    Delete your YouTube history, retrain the algo. My tip is female exercise videos work the same muscles but don’t put you on the incel algorithm.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      Tool reviews are another area dripping in incel content. I installed a 3rd party blocker to keep that shit at bay.

      • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        The Not Interested and Don't Recommend Channel buttons work surprisingly well for this. I am very protective of my algorithm so I try to avoid videos that I think will open up the flood gates for shitty content but in the event that it does, a few choice clicks of those two buttons usually has things bavk under control pretty quick.

          • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            20 days ago

            They definitely do because my recommendations are squeaky clean 98% of the time and those buttons, along with not clicking on shit that I think will poison my feed are the main tools I use to keep things clean.

            One thing to keep in mind is that YT makes changes to their algorithm every once in a while. For me, that typically manifests as sports channels, especially the NFL, or political stuff making their way into my feed. A few clicks of those buttons and I’m back to normal.

            • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              20 days ago

              I’ve repeatedly gotten recommended the same channel I told it I wasn’t interested in.

              • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                19 days ago

                All I can give you is an anecdote about my own experience. In said experience I’ve not had any non-starter issues with those two tools. They work for me until Youtube changes its algorithm.

                This is why I mentioned the NFL channel as an example. It’s my canary in the coalmine of Youtube. When the NFL channel (among other sports related channels) pops back up on my feed, I know that YouTube has changed something in the algorithm.

                I just click Not Interested and Don't Recommend Channel and away it goes for another year or so until they make another change. Simple as.

                I’ve curated a recommendation feed that is highly specific to my interests as a result. Not sure why that method wouldn’t work for you.

  • TachyonTele@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    Because you’re not looking.
    We have more games, videos, music, and art available right now then at any time in previous history.

    • kindred@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 days ago

      They’re not asking whether it’s literally true.

      They’re asking why it feels like there’s less.

      That’s a subjective, but still valid question.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    Because there’s less companies making media…

    30 studios will all want to have the blockbuster game of the year, then 2-3 others to be safe.

    3 studios want the same thing, but that’s a tenth of the games.

    Plus to make it even worse rather than a game being a one off sale, maybe some dlc, they want “live service” where people keep buying cosmetics. The studios don’t want people buying a bunch of games, they want you playing their flagship and only flagship.

    It’s less that the biggest studios but up smaller for talent, IP, or anything. They’re buying them up to shit them down to squash competition. That’s why we’re seeing it all over. Why bother making good media, when they can just make sure theirs is the only option?

  • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    Can’t say that is true for music at least. I heard new music everyday for the hundreds of artists I follow in youtube music and soundcloud.

  • flamiera@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    It only feels that way because one doesn’t explore.

    On a creative standpoint, the well of originality is drying up quickly.