cm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 day agoWebplemmy.mlimagemessage-square170fedilinkarrow-up1609arrow-down1127 cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1482arrow-down1imageWebplemmy.mlcm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square170fedilink cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squareflamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up54·1 day agoLossless encoding, by definition, won’t have any quality loss.
minus-squareCarighan Maconar@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·21 hours agoWatch some startup “invent” a revolutionary lossless format that discards some information.
minus-squarevithigar@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up4·15 hours agoXerox did that ages ago. https://www.dkriesel.com/en/blog/2013/0802_xerox-workcentres_are_switching_written_numbers_when_scanning
minus-squareulterno@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·14 hours ago did that ages ago That’s the point of revolution, no? Going back to something that was in the past, except giving it a new name and context:P
Lossless encoding, by definition, won’t have any quality loss.
Watch some startup “invent” a revolutionary lossless format that discards some information.
Xerox did that ages ago.
https://www.dkriesel.com/en/blog/2013/0802_xerox-workcentres_are_switching_written_numbers_when_scanning
That’s the point of revolution, no?
Going back to something that was in the past, except giving it a new name and context:P