You must log in or register to comment.
Reminds me of an early Bart Simpson
Looks like Barts older cousin
Fuck OP for posting this awful fork/10
- I hate it, but it appears functional
I immediately downvoted this fork… then scrolled back because I hate the fork, not the post. -238/10
This fork isn’t stamped out of sheet steel. It appears to have been forged out of a round bar stock. For that alone, it receives high marks, despite the unconventional appearance.
8/10.
Limited usefulness because it’s too narrow. Don’t like the asymmetry. Appearance looks a little crude. I wouldn’t want one. Tines seem overly sharp.
Probably good for getting olives out of jars.
If I got it at Goodwill for $.10, 6/10 because obviously that’s a manufacturing dud but I’ll give it a good home and use it when all the other utensils are dirty.
I wouldn’t be surprised to see this pathetic waste in some Michelin star restaurant pretending it’s trendy and they wasted hundreds buying 200 for $15 each. In that case -5/10.
Nah the michelin waste should be higher because some rich asshole lost an investment and some chef got a dream job for a while.
Knork/10
Not specific but technically follows the set rating system
I’d give it a perfect 5/7
Because that fork has trisomy 21.
I prefer this one. Way more area in the handle for better grip.
That’s not a fork that’s a thnork
- It’s not a good spork.
3.145183813819291837
Specific enough?
I guess but I’d prefer a rational answer.
That is a rational number
22/7 doesn’t count
3.145183813819291837 isn’t the beginning of π, it’s just some random number that happens to also start with 3.14
Yes, that’s technically allowed.
Insulting/purely decorative out of 10.
