• theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      What do you think laying off your workforce does? These are the people who produce the things that make money

      For a clear cut example, Microsoft and gaming. They lay off entire studios the moment they release a hit

      It costs like 18 months+ of salary to replace a role like that, and you’ll have to pay them more. It’ll make you a bit more money next quarter… But in 2-5 years when there’s no new game?

      • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Microsoft is doing pretty well so I wouldn’t call it “dismantling”, it seems to be working for them.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          38 minutes ago

          Microsoft is dismantling itself to keep “doing well”. That’s my point

          Their gaming division keeps acquiring and killing game studios. They’re killing off consoles, instead they’re going to sell prebuilds running windows. They’re scaling it all way back and releasing their exclusives, letting steam run the infrastructure, and milking all of their current IP, but not really making more

          They’ve ended support for a ton of different product lines. Azure is a mess. Their desktop market share is falling too.

          They’re all in on AI at this point, literally every tool they offer has it now. It’s not even opt in, it doesn’t require an account anymore… They’re desperate to inflate the numbers so they can project growth a little longer

          What do you think happens when you continuously lay off your workforce and kill projects? When you stop actually doing things, and run a company based on speculation?

          Eventually, the bubble pops.

      • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Pretty sure Intel is still alive and their problems are systematic from many years ago when AMD released Bulldozer and Intel decided it can stop innovating. So don’t think they fit here.