For example:

  1. Is there an alternative to GitHub Desktop that works for Codeberg or do I just have to use the CLI for it?

  2. If I have to use the CLI, is using git for Codeberg any different than using it for GitHub?

    • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Among those limitless git guis I started trying out sourcegit and it seems pretty good. To date magit is the only other one I’ve tried, and it’s also really good.

      • limerod@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Magit is built for emacs. Unless, OP is willing to see the positives of emacs and willing to learn a new editor. Switching won’t be that simple.

        • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Well there are a lot of positives… anyway I just mentioned it as a point of reference. If you know Magit, you know it’s good.

  • cosmicrose@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    Codeberg doesn’t have much compute available for CI runners, and asks that you use the runners they do have sparingly. If you’re into the self-hosting thing, you can run the Forgejo runner, which has the same workflow syntax as GitHub Actions, or you can run something like Woodpecker CI, which has its own workflow syntax. I’ve had better luck running Woodpecker myself and I have it running jobs for all my projects as well as a Renovate bot that runs every hour.

  • grandel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    As far as I know GitHub Desktop also works with other git hosting plattforms.

    It may be outdated info though. Have you tried it with codeberg?

  • gecko@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    is there an alternative front-end for codeberg like there is gothub for github ?