What’s up with this straight up pro-china and pro-russia stuff on Lemmy lately?

It’s not even praising the people of China and Russia, but rather their gov directly.

Obviously the states have problems, and the EU to a lesser degree, but they at least have some human rights.

Is this some kind of organized disinformation campaign?

      • bobzer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Jeffrey Sachs

        Is there a reason we would give more credence to an economist when discussing a pandemic rather than listening to the consensus of epidemiologists around the world?

        • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          The authority being highlighted wasn’t Jeffrey Sachs on his own, but The Lancet.

          • bobzer@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Fair enough. Though he was named directly and is still just an economist.

            Besides I’ve read the paper now. All it says is there there is still the possibility of the virus having been released due to a research related incident.

            That’s a far cry from “CIA bioweapon” like the OOP believes.

            • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Though he was named directly and is still just an economist.

              Well he’s a famous guy and knows a lot of important people, directly worked with the CIA and USA government before. And Davel wasn’t saying “The Lancet published this conspiracy” but that the guy that the Lancet - who is very trustworthy - trusts and says is qualified to weigh in, is independently pushing it. So Jeremy was borrowing his authority from having been associated with The Lancet, and he has some authority already from his celebrity-status and previous work, not necessarily from his hard skills (economics).

              That’s a far cry from “CIA bioweapon” like the OOP believes.

              Okay. I believe that. I haven’t read the article and don’t want to weigh in. I haven’t investigated the claim, anything I add can only be nonsense. I wasn’t pushing a Fort Detrick bioweapon conspiracy, I just wanted to clarify Davel’s comment because I didn’t feel your objection to it was fair, or if it was just a question with no position then I answered the question. Feel free to discuss the article with Davel since you have both read the article.