This isn’t how to do that. This is a one time inconvenience that gets somebody arrested. If you want less reliance on cars, bigger societal changes need to happen.
It doesn’t, which is why I think the conspiracy that Just Stop Oil is sponsored by big oil to give the environmental movement a bad name is quite plausible. The other explanation is they’re organically that stupid.
How does making cars idle save the environment?
That’s like looking at a tennis match and asking “how does wearing white win the game?”.
Ignoring context to feign confusion is some weaksauce trolling.
No, this isn’t me feigning ignorance. There are much better uses of a person’s time if their goal is environmentalism than sitting in traffic.
Possibly , but that’s not what you said.
The implication was that making cars idle was the point of blocking in the road, which is wasn’t/isn’t.
How does <this thing that i know was not the point> <fulfil the goal i know is unrelated to the thing i just mentioned> ?
A failure of sentence structure or purposeful trolling.
Making using car uncomfortable and unreliable should push people to abandon it for other means of transportation.
This isn’t how to do that. This is a one time inconvenience that gets somebody arrested. If you want less reliance on cars, bigger societal changes need to happen.
And how does the average joe bring about social change?
With planning and a steady hand. It helps to not hang out at McDonald’s afterwards.
With great difficulty.
Indeed. I think, historically, the best way for the average joe to bring about social change is protest.
It doesn’t, which is why I think the conspiracy that Just Stop Oil is sponsored by big oil to give the environmental movement a bad name is quite plausible. The other explanation is they’re organically that stupid.