• gurnu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yep, all the faces are disjointed from each other and seem generated separately. No soul at all

    • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Shocking truth:

      Humans can make all art made by AI.

      Humans can make all calculations made by computers.

      People use tools to achieve their goals more efficiently. It’s the way it always has been. It doesn’t mean there’s no value attached to it.

      Incidentally, for all of the “this is AI” brigade, what are you picking up on? I’m not picking up on any of the classic tells. Aside from the closed fists in the first and last image, where I’d personally go for an open hand, I don’t see anything obviously amiss.

      • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Dude pulling on native american person’s braid, mother and daughter look too similar, mom’s hand is messed up, SS logos are messed up

        There’s a wave of AI generated comics hitting lemmy right now. At first i was in the same boat as you, found it difficult to identify

        Now after seeing more and more, my brain’s detection algorithms are updating.

        I’m quite good at seeing obvious AI slop images, but comics was a totallly new thing i had to learn to detect

  • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s an inherent problem of the human condition, for some reason our own moral compass becomes dysfunctional once the authority and therefore responsibility is with someone else. It’s the reason the Stanford Prison Experiment went so wrong once the professor took influence; we’re not inherently evil, we (as a species) are just drawn to the current ruleset as dictated by our social group or idol of choice, especially if we get convinced it’s somehow necessary.

    Obviously not trying to abolish any guilt here, people are still responsible for what they’re doing.

    In the end we need way higher quality of education globally, better social security, rethink society (don’t have children be on their own and make parents constantly burned out, god damn it) as well as political systems so they are designed to prevent any definition of an in- and out-group. Protections for who, what, where and how people are are great, and stuff like Germany’s Article 1 is a good start, but it needs to go way further.

    We need to design an environment that allows us humans to become more than we currently are if we ever want to get out of this cycle.

      • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        It confirms claims Zimbardo pushed participants towards the results he wanted, something he has disputed.

        That’s actually what I referred to, although I indeed didn’t know know about the other statements by participants. Only knew about someone in Stanford digging through the files and realizing Zimbardo fucked everything up by pushing towards a certain outcome. Mmh…

        I still stand with my statements about what we should do better though.

        • shrugs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m with you on that. Most people all to thankfully give up their responsibility and do what they are told. The less they see the outcome of their actions the better (drone Pilots for example).

          Anyway, i think the stanford prision experiment is a bad example for that though, because it also incorprates peer pressure and concludes that nobody will think twice doing harm to others, as long as they are told to do so by authority. Humanity isn’t that bad I hope

          • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Humanity isn’t that bad I hope

            Then explain human history and literally everything else we know. It is only denial, optimistic bias, self delusion, and other mediating psychological effects that allow us to see ourselves as anything better.

  • MuskyMelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I approve the message! The images are just reinforcement so I don’t really care if it’s AI. Not everyone can draw.

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      And what about the theft and abuse of creators that was required to create the AI in the first place? If we’re just going to steal shit, we don’t even need the AI, we can just steal shit from each other.

      • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Human artists train using other artists work. Every avenue of human endeavour is based on what came before.

        My own default style shares similarities with Barbara Canepa and Rumikp Takahashi. Why? Because, as a teen, I used to copy their stuff, trying to “unlock” the parts of it that I like.

        If I was to directly copy an image, and say it was my own, then that crosses over into stealing. But that’s not what has happened here. And unless you get very specific with the prompts, it’s not likely to happen.

        • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Okay, but did you literally illegally download the material in the first place? Did you violate licenses that you obtained the material under? Do you intentionally imitate specific artists so that casual observers can’t tell the difference and then fill the entire space with more shitty art using that style than any human artist could ever product, such that the original artist who developed it no longer has control over that style and has their future income devastated?

          It’s not the same thing and you’d have to be willfully ignorant by this point to think that it is. All the major LLMs are “fruit of the poisonous tree.” They were trained using stolen data that they were not entitled to use for those purposes. The artists SHOULD HAVE BEEN PAID for their work training the AI.

  • D_C@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The good news for (most of) the pieces of shit from the 1830s and 1940s is that there wasn’t a tool for us to use to name and shame.
    However for this generation of fascist scum there is now the internet. And it should be used to track down and tackle the ICE scumbags. Fuck them.

    Edit: Reee, AI, blah blah because, yes, that’s the most horrible thing about this post. Definitely not the kidnapping and fascism. Fuck sake.

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Fuck sake.

      Dude. Nobody got kidnapped or fascisted over this post. But the use of AI was a real thing that actually occurred. Yes, it’s perfectly appropriate for people to care about that, and some people, believe it or fucking not, can hold two things in their heart at the same time. If I can make you ignore whatever I’m actually doing just by referencing Mussolini, I have a superpower over you. And maybe people do.

      Also, fuck your low key ableism. Let “reee” die.

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Interesting moral dilemma: is ai use acceptable if it’s to spread a message like this?

  • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    I get that Lemmy foams at the mouth whenever AI is involved, but why are there multiple comments calling this AI? Text is all correct, fingers are all correct, am I missing something?

    • Wytch@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      There are a lot of “you can tell by the way it is” type comments so I’ll be specific. Zoom in on the eyes of the Native American. Observe how the Union officer isn’t really gripping his arm with that hand. The little boy in the final panel is missing eye details.

      There are some other telling details but those jump out right away.

    • Bezier@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The entire “art style” reeks of ai. Just look at those faces. It looks more like a filter than a drawing.

      I think the uncanny look is caused by the generator being mostly trained on photos or 3d cgi instead of actual drawings.

      Edit: There’s also purpose, which the generator couldn’t handle at all. These peoples gazes are pointing at very weird directions and their expressions don’t make any sense for the scene, or for what the image is supposed to convey.

      The sheriff looks like he’s being portrayed as tough, manly, and cool, while the native american is waiting for someone. The creepy SS officer is actually kind of okay, but the concentration camp victim is afraid of a scooby doo ghost. ICE dude is tired and waiting for his shift to end. The three people under him (why suddenly three??) look “sad”, but not in a way that makes me feel it at all.

    • Sunkblake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      The new openai model is very good at all these details, so it’s hard to tell. I also think this is AI i cant explain why though, it just looks AI to me.

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      ChatGPT has a limited set of styles it tends to use, so once you see it a few times the rest starts looking more like AI. Text is “correct”, but that font in particular really stands out to me. Very detailed styles like that are also rare if it’s not AI because it would be way more work than something simple, if someone was putting in that effort the concept would probably follow the visuals more rather than the other way around, the expressions of the characters and the directions they’re looking seem a little bit random like that aspect of it was an afterthought.

      Overall I actually like AI but I don’t really like the way it’s used here, the visuals are too goofy for the serious topic to the point where it gives off a slightly sarcastic vibe, and they don’t add a lot to a concept that would probably otherwise be a screenshot of a tweet or something.

    • Mothra@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      The way the officers hold the people makes no sense. The hands are not bad overall but if you can do five pretty well then you wouldn’t suck at making the little kid’s hand- it’s wonky, if it were a person drawing you’d see a similar level of wonkiness on all hands not just that one. Also you would try to make things a bit more dramatic, if a person has this level of skill they probably can figure out gaze directions and enhance facial expressions a bit more to add to it.

      I wonder what the prompts were. It reminds me of Shaun Tan

  • Greyfoxsolid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    What’s more annoying? That people have the ability to generate content with AI, or that everyone on lemmy constantly complains about it?

    You’re banging your heads against walls over and over. Stop. Shut up.