• BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    He also doesn’t have to murder Venezuelan fishers, shoot/kidnap/torture Americans and our guests, rob the poor and deprive them of medical care and food to pay his wealthy loyalists, or rape children.

    He does it because he wants to.

  • radix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    I hope the next President makes two changes to the WH:

    1. Restore the previous incarnation of the East Wing, but with a plaque listing all the people and companies that supposedly paid for it, labeled “In remembrance of these individuals that bribed the President.”

    2. Leave the paved-over Rose Garden, and rename it to the Donald J. Trump Memorial Concrete Slab.

  • BenLeMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    So, quick question: what exactly does he need a ballroom for? It’s not like he’s any good at dancing, even though he is somewhat famous for his double-handed cock milker move. Exhibit A

    What’s more, he doesn’t have any balls, either. Certainly not the kind that would require a dedicated room. Exhibit B

    I really don’t get these brain farts of his. But hey, I’m not the one with syphilis-induced dementia here.

    God, I can’t wait until you guys finally muster the courage to oust this wannabe dictator and his clique.

    • smeenz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      His entire life has been based around his perception of what people above him think of him. That’s why he plastered the oval office with garish gold leaf everywhere. He thinks it will impress people like putin and erdoğan and kim . Even more so because he’s showing that he has the power to spend lavishly on stuff the country doesn’t want or need because that’s what dictators do.

      That’s what this is for

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        You missed another thing he loves doing. He smashed an historical building in the early '70s in NYC during the starting of his “real estate” career. He smashed an historical building while other people were offering to pay to have the historical artifacts properly recovered. His excuse at the time? “It would have been too expensive.” Meanwhile he knew it would have been free to him, it just would have taken 6-8 months later for him to break ground.

        He’s continued desecrating any historical site he can get his hands on, to this day.

        He gets off on destroying historical monuments.

        • Tower@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Not even that long. According to “John Baron”, it was 2 weeks.

          Trump surprised New York’s art community on June 5, 1980 when a demolition crew jackhammered the sculptures off of the building. In addition, the intricate grillwork was removed. The destruction drew a public outcry. The Met received no advance notice.

          Trump initially avoided any comment about the Bonwit Teller artwork. But John Baron, a spokesperson with the Trump Organization, contacted the New York Daily News to discuss the situation. Baron informed the Daily News that “the merit of the stones was not great enough to justify the effort to save them.” Baron stated that the removal process could have set back Trump Tower’s construction timeline by two weeks. Baron also told the New York Times that he had no idea what happened to the ornate grillwork.

          https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaellisicky/2020/10/03/how-donald-trump-took-down-bonwit-teller-a-fifth-avenue-landmark/

    • Rothe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Because it is not so much a ball room as it is a throne room. He wants a giant hall where he can preside at a throne in the end, where people who wants to see him has to walk through the entire thing feeling humbled, just like his dictator pals does it.

  • Deadeyegai@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Man… Seriously! Fuck this guy. I hope when the Epstein files finally get released he fucking burns

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      “Distracting headlines” as a canard gets a bit old. Everything is a distraction from everything else, because we have a heavily monopolized mass media and a shrinking pool of investigative journalists with any kind of budget.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decline_of_newspapers#United_States

      When you had twice as many newspapers and half as many people, the idea of “distracting headlines” was more a matter of consumer choice (you could read serious news at the New York Times or junk pop-media at the New York Post). Now media functions as a cartel, with papers all echoing one another on topics of the day. Or deliberately remaining silent on embarrassments the business community owners would rather not talk about.

      This isn’t a “Trump” problem, though. Its a problem of consolidation and privatization on a national scale.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Well, look at lemmy anytime someone posts a link that requires you to pay for the journalism. Pitchforks and torches. People don’t want to pay for quality journalism, do they get whatever billionaires want to feed them.

        • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Well, look at lemmy anytime someone posts a link that requires you to pay for the journalism. Pitchforks and torches.

          People don’t want to pay for something they don’t think is quality.

          It’s not like these companies would clean up their act if they got another viable revenue stream. We can see that because when companies do, they regularly just keep the extra cash.

          What you’d need is a boot strapped organization that actually had standards people cared about and didn’t bend. Its an impossibly hard situation, yes, but that does not make your snark prescient or clever. More than that, it doesnt at all back up your conclusion that people don’t want to pay for quality journalism. It just doesnt exist, because it gets bought out by billionaires.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          anytime someone posts a link that requires you to pay for the journalism

          People subscribing to random newspapers via links on Lemmy would not be a sustainable model for funding local journalism. And - historically - plenty of people did subscribe to local outlets. Plenty still do. Hell, go on Patreon or Substack and see how well the nascent podcast journalism marketplace is doing.

          What changed over the last 40 years was a wave of M&As targeting smaller papers to consolidate the news markets. Case in point, my own city of Houston had half a dozen different newspapers chugging along just fine for decades. But because they were small, they were also very cheap. Loose monetary policy in the 90s made buying up papers very cheap. So the Houston Chronicle went around town buying the smaller papers and shutting them down. Now its the only major newspaper of record remaining.

          “Well, people on Lemmy should have paid for more subscriptions to the Houston Post” is a fucking asinine statement, given that their stated reason for failure was cost of newsprint rising in the early 90s and they stopped existing before most of the people on this site were even born.

          • Tja@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I don’t thing the likes of wsj, nyt or similar are “random newspapers”, and they still get hate for asking for money. Bezos finds that useful.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              The NYT is what billionaires want to tell me, and if they expect me to pay for the privilege they’re out of their minds. Oughta be paying me to read that trash.

              If you were talking about actually independent sources providing other perspectives then you might have a point.

              • Tja@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                I’m talking about all sources, the average lemmy user doesn’t distinguish nuance, they complain about all paywalls. And billionaires take advantage of that and obviously buy the papers with the widest reach first, but with time they’ll reach everywhere.

                • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I’m talking about all sources

                  Yet the only ones you listed are the billionaire backed ones. Curious.

                  Almost as if your argument is in bad faith because you yourself don’t have any great examples of the sort of thing people would want to support that are also news outlets with reporters, and so you are forced to use bad examples.

                  Ill give you an example though, just like the other person pointed out, there are smaller sources popping up everywhere. Even youtube journalism such as HowTown are pockets of not yet corporate information sources that people are fine with supporting.

  • Num10ck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    heres the secret reason in my theory: the east wing is where Trump gave a bj to Bill Clinton. ok who has the guest logs on when they were both present?

  • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Great, let’s tear down a well-preserved historic building in pristine condition for no absolute reason at all!

    • InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Might as well go back to the 1812 method of renovating at this point.
      Probably less insulting to the concept of the USA than whatever the fuck this is.

      • AxExRx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think the next president should tear down and start from scratch. Eho nlknows what kind of bugs that traitor has let his foreign ‘pals’ put wherever.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The east wing was built in like 1902. It’s historic but it’s not super duper old and was rebuilt in the 40s to hide a bunker under it.

  • ameancow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    The right and Trump’s own base really didn’t like him doing this. This will do as much if not more harm to him from his own side than the goddamn Epstein files.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I hope the non-union contractors does not receive a single cent and files a lawsuit against the Orange Moron they voted for.